Equities were basically listless, with small declines across most averages. For the week, the Dow dipped 0.4% and the S&P500 declined 0.9%. The Transports lost 0.8% and the Utilities declined 0.4%. The Morgan Stanley Cyclical index dropped 2%, while the Morgan Stanley Consumer index fell 0.6%. The broader market was down, with the small cap Russell 2000 declining 1% and the S&P400 Mid-cap index losing 1.2%. The NASDAQ100 fell 1.1%, and the Morgan Stanley High Tech index dipped 0.6%. The Semiconductors were about unchanged, while the NASDAQ Telecommunications index was down 0.5%. The Biotechs slipped 0.3%. The financials were mixed. The Broker/Dealers were down 0.7%, while the Banks added 0.8%. With bullion down $9.90, the HUI Gold index fell 4%.
For the week, two-year Treasury yields declined 2 basis points to 4.01%. Five-year government yields fell 4 basis points to 4.08%, and ten-year Treasury yields were also down 4 basis points for the week, to 4.21%. Long-bond yields dipped 3 basis points to 4.42%. The spread between 2 and 10-year government yields narrowed 2 to 20. Benchmark Fannie Mae MBS yields dipped only 0.5 basis points, notably under-performing Treasuries. The spread (to 10-year Treasuries) on Fannie’s 4 5/8% 2014 note was unchanged at 30, and the spread on Freddie’s 5% 2014 note was one basis point wider at 30. The 10-year dollar swap spread increased 0.5 to 44.75. Corporate bond spreads remain tight, with auto bond and CDS spreads little changed this week. Junk bond spreads generally narrowed this week. The implied yield on 3-month December Eurodollars was unchanged at 4.285%, while December ’06 Eurodollar yields declined 4.5 basis points to 4.45%.
Corporate issuance slowed to about $10 billion. This week’s investment grade issuers included Merrill Lynch $3.25 billion, Washington Mutual $1.25 billion, International Lease Finance $600 million, JPMorgan Chase $550 million, SunTrust Bank $850 million, Centex $500 million, Textron Financial $450 million, Knight-Ridder $400 million, Met Life $300 million, Comerica $250 million, Avnet $250 million, Arizona Public Service $250 million, and Pan Pacific Retail Properties $100 million.
Junk bond fund outflows declined to $197 million (from AMG). Junk issuers included Mediacom $200 million, Syniverse Tech $175 million, Citisteel USA $170 million, Columbus McKinnon $135 million, and Intcomex $120 million.
Japanese 10-year JGB yields declined 2.5 basis points this week to 1.41%. Emerging debt markets were mixed. More corruption allegations pressured Brazil’s markets, as benchmark dollar bond yields jumped 10 basis points to 8.05%. Mexican govt. yields declined 5 basis points to 5.43%. Russian 10-year dollar Eurobond yields slipped one basis point to 6.20%.
Freddie Mac posted 30-year fixed mortgage rates dropped 9 basis points to 5.80%, a three-week low. Rates were one basis point below the year ago level. Fifteen-year fixed mortgage rates fell 7 basis points to 5.40%. One-year adjustable rates added one basis point to 4.58%, up 34 basis points in seven weeks and 57 basis points higher than a year earlier. The Mortgage Bankers Association Purchase Applications Index was about unchanged. Purchase applications were about 7% ahead of the year ago level, with dollar volume up almost 19%. Refi applications rose 5%. The average new Purchase mortgage dipped slightly to $243,000, while the average ARM jumped to a record $358,800. The percentage of ARMs declined to 28.9% of total applications.
Broad money supply (M3) expanded $5.4 billion to a record $9.779 Trillion (week of August 8). Year-to-date, M3 has expanded at a 5.1% rate, with M3-less Money Funds expanding at a 6.4% pace. For the week, Currency declined $0.7 billion. Demand & Checkable Deposits declined $9.4 billion. Savings Deposits dipped $3.8 billion. Small Denominated Deposits rose $3.5 billion. Retail Money Fund deposits fell $1.9 billion, while Institutional Money Fund deposits added $0.5 billion. Large Denominated Deposits jumped $10.8 billion, with a y-t-d gain of $147.4 billion (22% annualized). For the week, Repurchase Agreements gained $6.4 billion, while Eurodollar deposits were unchanged.
Bank Credit rose $5.5 billion last week. Year-to-date, Bank Credit has expanded $549.5 billion, or 13.2% annualized. Securities Credit declined $11.3 billion during the week, with a year-to-date gain of $133.9 billion (11.3% ann.). Loans & Leases have expanded at a 14.3% pace so far during 2005, with Commercial & Industrial (C&I) Loans up an annualized 17.8%. For the week, C&I loans declined $1.9 billion, while Real Estate loans expanded $7.8 billion. Real Estate loans have expanded at a 16.6% rate during the first 32 weeks of 2005 to $2.802 Trillion. Real Estate loans were up $380 billion, or 15.7%, over the past 52 weeks. For the week, Consumer loans added $1.7 billion, and Securities loans jumped $10.5 billion. Other loans dipped $1.2 billion.
Total Commercial Paper jumped $13.3 billion last week to $1.588 Trillion. Total CP has expanded $174 billion y-t-d, a rate of 19.4% (up 17.7% over the past 52 weeks). Financial CP surged $13.7 billion last week to $1.446 Trillion, with a y-t-d gain of $161.8 billion (19.9% ann.). Non-financial CP dipped $0.4 billion to $141.8 billion (up 15.0% ann. y-t-d and 9.9% over 52 wks).
ABS issuance jumped this week to $20 billion, including $15 billion of home equity securitizations (from JPMorgan). Year-to-date total issuance of $473 billion is 23% ahead of comparable 2004. Home Equity Loan ABS issuance of $302 billion is 26% above comparable 2004.
Fed Foreign Holdings of Treasury, Agency Debt jumped $7.0 billion to $1.468 Trillion for the week ended August 17. “Custody” holdings are up $132.5 billion y-t-d, or 15.6% annualized (up $203bn, or 16.0%, over 52 weeks). Federal Reserve Credit rose $2.0 billion to $793.7 billion. Fed Credit has expanded 0.6% annualized y-t-d (up $39.5bn, or 5.2%, over 52 weeks).
International reserve assets (excluding gold) - as accumulated by Bloomberg’s Alex Tanzi - were up $601 billion, or 18.2%, over the past 12 months to $3.908 Trillion. Japan’s reserves, the world’s largest, were up $21.62 billion, or 2.7%, over the past year to $821.68 billion.
The dollar index rallied almost 2% this week. On the upside, the Jamaica dollar and Israeli shekel gained 0.8%. On the downside, the Brazilian real dropped 3.1%, the Norwegian krone 3.3%, the South African rand 2.9%, and the Swedish krona declined 2.9%.
September crude oil fell $1.51 to $65.35. For the week, the CRB index declined 2.4%, lowering y-t-d gains to 11.0%. The Goldman Sachs Commodities index dropped 3.3%, with 2005 gains falling to 37.6%.
August 17 – World Bank: “Fueled by strong external trade, real gross domestic product (GDP) in China grew a stronger than expected 9.5 percent in the first half of 2005, according to the August issue of the China Quarterly Update. With merchandise exports up by 33 percent in the first half (in US$ terms), and by 29 percent in July, China reached a trade surplus of US$50 billion in the first 7 months. Imports, meanwhile, decelerated significantly from 33 percent in 2004 to 14 percent in the first half.”
August 16 – Bloomberg (Nerys Avery and Rob Delaney): “China’s fixed-asset investment grew 27.7 percent in July, led by spending on oil refineries and coal mines to ease energy shortages. For the first seven months, investment in the nation’s towns and cities rose 27.2 percent from a year earlier to 3.46 trillion yuan ($427 billion)…”
August 15 – Bloomberg (Nerys Avery): “China’s industrial production rose 16.1 percent in July as companies including General Motors Corp. and Huaneng Power International Inc. boosted output to meet rising demand in the world's fastest-growing major economy.”
August 16 – XFN: “China’s major ports handled 2.2 bln tons of cargo in the first seven months this year, up 18.7% year-on-year, the Ministry of Communications said… From January to July, container throughput at the ports increased 24.2% from a year earlier…”
August 17 – Bloomberg (Jianguo Jiang): “Growth in China’s property prices slowed in the first seven months of the year from the first half as unsold real estate space rose, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. Prices gained an average 9.7 percent from a year earlier…”
Asia Boom Watch:
August 16 – Bloomberg (Lily Nonomiya): “Morgan Stanley Japan Ltd. raised its growth estimate for Japan’s economy this fiscal year… Morgan Stanley raised its forecast for economic growth for the year ending March 31, 2006 to 2.5 percent, from an earlier forecast of 1.6 percent…”
August 15 – Bloomberg (Cherian Thomas): “India’s economy will grow 7 percent in the current financial year ending March 31, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said. ‘This year we will achieve an economic growth of 7 percent,’ Singh said on the occasion of India’s 59th Independence Day. ‘If we keep this pace, in 10 years we will be able to wipe out poverty. This is no longer a dream but is a possibility now.’”
August 16 – Bloomberg (William Sim): “South Korea’s economy will expand at a potential annual growth rate of 5 percent next year after growing between 4 percent and 5 percent in the second half of this year, Finance Minister Han Duck Soo said.”
August 18 – Bloomberg (Theresa Tang and James Peng): “Taiwan’s economic growth rebounded from a two-year low in the past quarter and is forecast to gather pace as companies and consumers increase spending. Gross domestic product rose 3 percent from a year earlier after climbing 2.5 percent in the first quarter…”
August 17 – Bloomberg (Sara Webb): “Singapore’s exports in July rose at nearly three times the pace expected by economists as companies shipped more computer chips and pharmaceuticals. Non-oil domestic exports rose a seasonally adjusted 12 percent from June… Exports in July expanded at the fastest pace in 2 1/2 years.”
August 15 – Bloomberg (Sara Webb): “Singapore’s retail sales rose 9.4 percent in June from a year earlier, exceeding economists’ expectations, as Singaporeans bought more cars and tourists boosted spending on clothes, watches and jewelry.”
August 17 – Bloomberg (Beth Jinks and Laurent Malespine): “Thailand’s economy, Southeast Asia’s second-largest, expanded less than 4 percent in the second quarter… The $163 billion economy is slowing as higher oil prices increase the cost of imports, dent consumer confidence and push up production costs…”
Unbalanced Global Economy Watch:
August 18 – Bloomberg (Simon Kennedy): “The inflation rate in the dozen nations sharing the euro rose to a seven-month high in July, exceeding the European Central Bank’s limit as oil prices jumped to record levels. Consumer prices rose 2.2 percent from a year ago…”
August 18 – Bloomberg (Sam Fleming): “U.K. mortgage lending in July was the weakest in more than 3 1/2 years, as households refrained from taking out debt in anticipation the Bank of England would lower interest rates the following month.”
August 16 – Reuters (Elif Kaban): “Lured by booming oil prices and friendly Kremlin ties, Western banks want to extend Russia the largest loans in its history, brushing aside fears of bad debts, the ghosts of fallen YUKOS and high levels of borrowing. The biggest loans include $7 billion to fund Russia’s purchase of a 10.7 percent stake in gas monopoly Gazprom, $2 billion for state oil firm Rosneft and up to $10 billion for Gazprom to buy oil firm Sibneft. One group of banks even temporarily waived covenants protecting their rights in a dispute over a defaulted loan with Rosneft so they could lend it even more money, bankers said.”
August 17 – Bloomberg (Torrey Clark and Michael Teagarden): “Russia attracted 31% more foreign direct investment in the first half than a year ago, as consumer goods producers such as Coca-Cola Co. and H.J. Heinz Co. bought Russian competitors amid a boom in spending. Foreign direct investment advanced to $4.49 billion in the first half, from $3.4 billion a year ago…”
Latin America Watch:
August 18 – Bloomberg (Guillermo Parra-Bernal and Carlos Caminada): “Brazil’s current account surplus rose to a record in July, led by a surge in exports. The surplus in the current account, the broadest measure of trade in goods and services, widened to $2.59 billion in July from $1.25 billion in June and $1.8 billion a year earlier… The surplus in July was the largest for any month since Jan. 1980, when the government began keeping records…”
August 16 – Bloomberg (Guillermo Parra-Bernal): “Brazilian retail sales rose in June at the fastest pace in three months, suggesting consumer spending on home appliances, cars and furniture is holding up after nine central bank interest-rate increases. Sales, as measured by units sold, rose 5.3 percent from a year ago…”
August 18 – Bloomberg (David Papadopoulos): “Venezuela’s economic expansion
quickened in the second quarter, led by a surge in manufacturing and construction. Gross domestic product grew 11.1 percent in the April-to-June period from a year ago, following growth of 7.5 percent in the first quarter…”
Bubble Economy Watch:
August 18 – Bloomberg (Kathleen M. Howley): “Fannie Mae…said U.S. sales of existing single-family houses will top 7 million for the first time ever in 2005 while prices rise by the most in a quarter century as low interest rates fuel demand. Sales will reach 7.03 million, up 3.6 percent from 2004’s record 6.78 million transactions, David Berson, Fannie Mae’s chief economist, said in a forecast in Washington… A month ago, he predicted 6.79 million sales. Home prices will rise 11 percent, Berson said, the biggest jump since a 12 percent gain in 1980.”
August 17 – New York Times (Robert Johnson): “Even in this gaudy city a building painted black and pink stands out. It needs to, because the one-floor structure at the corner of the Strip and Sahara Avenue is a condominium sales center in a metropolis where more than 100 new high-rise residences are in the works. The black-and-pink exterior was designed by the woman who is the namesake of the planned condominium… ‘It just screams Ivana.’ That would be Ivana Trump… Although the condo itself, scheduled for groundbreaking in mid-2006 and opening 30 months later, will be a relatively sedate silver color, it will command attention as the tallest skyscraper in Las Vegas. [The developer] estimates construction costs at $500 million… The Las Vegas condo market is heating up fast. Some 6,000 units are under construction, compared with about 300 in early 2004, according to Gunther Gedsl, a high-rise analyst… Some 6,000 units are in the preconstruction sales phase, he said, versus 4,000 as 2004 began… Mr. Gedsl estimated that 12,000 condo units had entered the ‘idea stage’ within the last 18 months.”
California Bubble Watch:
August 18 – Reuters (Jim Christie): “Home-ownership in California has increased to a level not seen since 1960 but it is coming at a high cost and risk for home buyers, according to a study… To keep up with soaring home prices, Californians are setting aside a dangerously large share of income for house payments and taking on risky mortgages, according to the Public Policy Institute of California. It found 52 percent of Californians who bought a home in the last two years spend more than 30 percent of their total income on housing and 20 percent of recent home buyers spend more than half of their income on housing.”
August 16 – Financial Times (Richard Beales ): “The global market for collateralised debt obligations - complex repackaged pools of bonds, loans and other debt-related instruments - could be dramatically higher than most investment banks have indicated, an independent industry consultant has estimated. In particular, if all the so-called "synthetic" products - or derivatives-related deals - are included, the total market could reach $800bn or more this year, according to Janet Tavakoli, an industry consultant. But the market remains opaque, with no standard way of measuring its size and many CDO arrangers reluctant to reveal information about bespoke transactions conducted privately with investors.”
August 17 – Financial Times (Deborah Brewster ): “Christie’s, the art auction house, had record sales in the first half of this year as the art market was buoyed by a convergence of old and new - US hedge fund and property moguls buying contemporary art, and Russian and Chinese buyers reclaiming their artistic heritage. Sales at Christie’s, which is owned by François Pinault, were $1.65bn in the six months to June - a third higher than last year. It sold 178 works of art for more than $1m, compared with 132 during the same period last year. [Sotheby’s] said it expected ‘the current buoyancy in the international art market to continue’. Matthew Weigman, a Sotheby’s spokesman, said: ‘What we are seeing is a rush of new buyers from Russia and China who are buying back their heritage.’ The auction house’s Hong Kong sale this year reaped $81m, which would have been unheard of just a few years ago, said Mr Weigman. Last year’s Hong Kong sale reached $57m.”
August 16 Financial Times (James Altucher ): “The latest twist in the growing secondary market for life insurance policies is an innovative asset-backed lending strategy called life insurance premium finance. There is a class of seniors who would like life insurance policies but acquiring a policy at that age can mean expensive premiums. However, because the secondary market in life insurance policies establishes a market and means for valuing policies it is possible for seniors to borrow the money to pay for the premiums and use the policy itself as the asset backing the loan. Why would people want to do this? Most of their assets could be illiquid or tied up in other investments… Why would investors want to lend? Lenders would typically receive the 10-15 per cent interest on the loan; lenders would be provided with an investment opportunity outside of traditional asset classes… Investors range from hedge funds to banks to endowments and all use life settlements not only as a source of returns but also as a way to diversify away from the traditional asset classes of equities, bonds, commodities.”
Mortgage Finance Bubble Watch:
August 15 – National Association of Realtors: “Total existing-home sales, which include single-family and condos, were at the highest pace on record in the second quarter, with 42 states showing higher sales in comparison with a year earlier… NAR’s latest report on total existing-home sales shows that the national seasonally adjusted annual rate was 7.22 million units in the second quarter, up 4.6 percent from the previous record of 6.90 million in the second quarter of 2004.”
August 16 – Bloomberg: “United States home prices surged 13.6 percent in the second quarter, the fastest pace in more than a quarter of a century, as a decline in interest rates fueled record sales. The median price of an existing single-family home rose to $208,500 from $183,500 a year earlier, the National Association of Realtors said…It was the biggest jump since a 15.3 percent gain in the third quarter of 1979.”
July Housing Starts were reported at a stronger-than-expected (and robust) 2.042 million pace, about 3% above the year ago level. Building Permits were a much stronger-than-expected 2.167 million pace, the strongest in more than 30 years. Starts were up 8.2% from a year earlier and up 32% from July 2001.
August 16 – American Banker (Damian Paletta): “Fresh evidence emerged…that lenders are piling into untested mortgage products and that regulators are increasingly worried about it. More than half of the respondents to the [Fed’s] quarterly survey of senior loan officers said their share of interest-only and other nontraditional mortgage products is substantially or moderately higher than a year before. Nearly a third said that such products make up 16% to 50% of their dollar volume of residential mortgages – substantially more than previously estimated. The survey report also said mortgage demand was up despite recent interest rate hikes and noted looser underwriting standards for commercial and industrial loans…”
August 19 – Inside Mortgage Finance: “According to Inside Alternative Mortgages, a new affiliate newsletter, Alt A mortgage activity has continued to climb to record levels through the midway point in 2005, fueled by burgeoning volume in interest-only mortgages, negative amortization ARMs and loans processed with ‘stated’ documentation.”
Golden West Financial reported a somewhat slower July. Originations dipped to $4.5 billion, down from June’s $4.8 billion. Loan growth slowed to 13% annualized, although y-o-y Loans were still up 24% to $113.9 billion. On the Liability side, FHLB Borrowings were up 20% y-o-y to $36.3 billion, with Deposits up 19% to $59.4 billion.
The Bond Market Association (2nd) Quarter Research Quarterly:
“…U.S. bond issuance rose slightly in the second quarter, reaching $1.36 trillion, a 1.6 percent increase over the first quarter. Mortgage related securities, U.S. Treasuries and corporate bonds all fell during the quarter but municipal bond issuance was higher and the volume of asset-backed securities increased sharply, rising 19.2 percent over the first quarter and nearly 40 percent more than the second quarter last year. For the first six months of the year, ABS issuance totaled $555.6 billion, a 35.5 percent increase…”
“Overall bond market issuance for the first half of the year…remains 7.8 percent below the same period last year primarily because of a sharp decline in the amount of debt issued by federal agencies, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac… Private label originators picked up some of the slack… Overall, mortgage-backed issuance rose in the second quarter 5.7 percent but fell 11.7 percent for the full first half of the year…”
“U.S. Treasury and corporate bond issuance was also off for the first six months of the year. Gross coupon Treasury issuance fell from $427.0 billion a year ago to $413.5 billion this year, as the economy strengthened and tax revenues increased… Daily trading volume of Treasury securities by primary dealers averaged $568.2 billion in the first half, up 13.4%... [from] the same period a year ago. Issuance of municipal bonds rose during the first half of the year as well, climbing 7.3 percent to $228.7 billion…”
“Corporate bond issuance declined to $340.8 billion in the first half of the year, 6.9 percent lower than…a year ago... Considering the ample corporate cash positions, issuance supply growth will be dependent on such factors as capital spending and M&A and LBO activity… Investment grade non-convertible debt issuance declined slightly through the first six months, to $301.3 billion… New issue volume of non-convertible high-yield debt totaled $39.5 billion through the first six months, a 32.1 percent decline…”
“The torrid pace of new issue activity in the asset-backed securities (ABS) market continued in the first half…and it is on pace to surpass the $1 trillion mark by the end of the year. The strong housing market, new product development, low interest rates, and robust investor demand have led to a semiannual issuance record of $555.6 billion… Securitization of home equity loans is by far the biggest piece of the ABS market, accounting for nearly 40 percent of issuance, and it is showing no sign of slowing down. Record high home prices have created enormous value for home owners who are now tapping into it by taking out home equity loans… Higher auto sales have also contributed to greater ABS issuance…”
“Mortgage-related securities issuance, which included agency and non-agency pass-throughs and CMOs, increased 5.7 percent in the second quarter to $429.9 billion, compared to… the first quarter (first half issuance of $836.5bn was down 11.7% from comparable refi-driven 2004)… According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, mortgage originations increased to an estimated $779 billion in the second quarter, up from $597 billion in the first quarter… Private label issuers are able to securitize jumbo mortgages in excess of the conforming loan limit and are more likely to take on additional exposure from riskier loans, such as ARMs, sub-prime and Alt-A. Issuance of private-label MBS increased to $238.7 billion in the first half…up [40%] from $170.4 billion issued in the first half of 2004.”
“The average daily volume of total outstanding repurchase (repo) and reverse repo agreement contracts totaled $5.47 trillion in the first half of 2005, an increase of 17.4 percent from the $4.66 trillion daily average outstanding during the same period a year ago. Daily outstanding repo agreements increased 17.1 percent, to an average of $3.17 trillion… Through the second quarter of 2005, over $204.2 trillion in repo trades were submitted by [Clearing Corporation’s Government Securities Division], with an average daily volume of approximately $1.6 trillion (24% above year ago volume).”
“The outstanding volume of money market instruments, including commercial paper (CP), large time deposits and banker’s acceptances, totaled $3.15 trillion…a 4.7% increase from the total at the end of March 2005 (up 19% from one year ago). CP outstanding totaled $1.51 trillion…an increase of 4% [during the quarter and up 15% over 12 months]… Financial CP outstanding stood at $1.38 trillion…5.3 percent higher [for the quarter and up 16% y-o-y]. The use of CP to finance mortgage pipelines drove much of the financial CP growth.”
Updating the Mortgage Finance Bubble:
This is a most fascinating period for analyzing the Mortgage Finance Bubble. On the one hand, with both home transaction volumes and average prices at all-time highs, Mortgage Credit growth remains at extreme levels. Fannie’s latest forecast has Mortgage debt expanding by 10.4% this year, this following the doubling of Mortgage borrowings over the previous seven years. On the other hand, there is clearly newfound seriousness by bank regulators seeking to stymie the riskiest bank lending practices. And while home sales remain at a record pace, the inventory of unsold homes is rising. Some of the hottest markets are experiencing a rapid buildup of houses for sale. The highflying mortgage REIT and subprime stocks are coming back to earth, while MBS spreads are quietly widening. Meanwhile, the media are now all over the housing Bubble story.
If this were a decade ago, I would be forcefully arguing that the top was in and warning that air would soon be seeping from the Mortgage Finance Bubble. Such assuredness would stem from my confidence that regulatory restraint would soon instill caution throughout the banking community, especially in the conspicuously frothy markets. Credit availability and marketplace liquidity would almost immediately be impacted, ushering in the downside of the Credit cycle. Today, the nature of the analysis leaves me less confident. Bankers were supplanted as the marginal source of housing liquidity by the securities markets and the leveraged speculating community. The analysis has become much more complex.
It has been highly instructive to observe the markets’ and economy’s resiliency to a major energy price “shock.” In a different environment, interest rates would have lurched higher, followed by faltering confidence, retreating asset markets, and a stagnating economy. Yet, these days market rates largely ignore surging energy costs, at least until prices really spike and incite notions of a strapped American consumer. All the same, the dollars the consumer sector is losing at the pump are small change compared to inflating home equity (coupled with rising incomes). The National Association of Realtors puts second quarter housing inflation at 13.6% y-o-y, “the fastest pace in more than a quarter of a century.”
I do believe that Credit Bubble “blow-off” liquidity excesses are directly responsible for buoyant bond and inflating home prices, as well as system resiliency to sharply higher energy prices. And if today’s boom can so readily disregard spiking energy costs, can markets similarly ignore a little tough talk from bank regulators? To be sure, market dynamics must remain at the forefront of Credit Bubble analysis.
As much as the bond market – and perhaps even the Fed - wishes to believe it, I am skeptical that regulation can be counted upon to rein in mortgage finance excess. First of all, with recent price gains so enticing and the real estate mania now firmly entrenched, I believe significantly higher rates and reduced Credit Availability will be required to pierce this historic speculative Bubble. And, of course, no one – not the Federal Reserve, bank regulators, bond managers or the markets – has any inclination to see a deflating housing Bubble. Instead, the hope is that housing markets will gradually slow without too negative of consequences for the economy and marketplace liquidity. There are today great expectations that a little regulatory arm-twisting will provide just the right level of measured restraint. If only “measured” was in any manner Credit Bubble effectual…
I will, until proven otherwise, stick with the framework that it is the Financial Sphere today driving the Economic Sphere. To this point, economic weakness has been taken out of the equation by the tenacity of bond market rallies engendered by any indication of waning growth. Considering these powerful dynamics, serious analysis must at least contemplate the possibility that similar Credit market dynamics will significantly influence the nature of the unfolding housing topping process. A rise in market yields has, over the past two weeks, been interrupted by perceptions of household and housing vulnerability. Would such a market reaction, if ongoing, ensure continued excess liquidity, sustaining Bubble excess and fueling higher home prices?
From the intensity of current marketing efforts, I will surmise that interest-only and “option ARMs” remain the hot products - in spite of bank regulator hopes and desires. Do an “option ARM” Google search and there will be a long list of links including ones to wamuhomeloans.com, interestonly.com, and eloan.com. Search “interest only mortgage” and a similarly long list will include lendingtree.com and quickenloans.com. It is Quicken that has so aggressively promoted its SmartChoice “option-ARM” product. “Month after month, you can choose to pay interest only or the combined interest and principal. Your monthly mortgage payment can be up to 45% lower than a traditional mortgage!” A $150,000 mortgage for as little as $578 a month, $200,000 for $750, or $300,000 for $1,125. And tax advantages! I see nothing in the current environment that makes such a product less enticing to many borrowers - for a multitude of reasons.
It is reasonable for analysts, observing rising housing inventories, affordability issues, somewhat rising mortgage rates, and newfound regulator engagement, to call for a housing bubble top. From my analytical framework, however, I would expect to observe some change in (securities) marketplace liquidity and Credit Availability before venturing a guess that the Mortgage Finance Bubble is peaking. And based upon the breadth and scope of the mortgage finance infrastructure that has evolved during this most protracted of booms, I am forced to err on the side of caution when it comes to forecasting The Bubble’s demise. And it is, furthermore, difficult for me to envision how such a Bubble goes out with a whimper.
Today, we are on pace for an astounding $1 Trillion of 2005 ABS issuance, a large percentage that is mortgage-related. And, according to an article this week in The Financial Times, CDO (Collateralized Debt Obligations) issuance could top $800 billion, again with real estate loans comprising much of the underlying collateral. In addition, private-label MBS issuance is booming. To this point, the marketplace has demonstrated an insatiable appetite for mortgage-related securities and instruments.
But I am open to suggestion that we may be approaching some type of inflection point. Will all the media attention begin to spook prospective homebuyers? The banking industry will surely feel the pressure to somewhat tighten standards at the margin, although I would expect that the enormous apparatus of non-bank mortgage brokers, “correspondents,” and online lenders will gladly take any business turned away by traditional bankers (that is, for as long as they can sell their mortgages for securitization!). And somewhat (near-term marginally) tighter lending terms and higher short-term interest-rates may, going forward, tend to limit price gains in the most inflated markets (where “option ARM” borrowers reside as marketplace price-setters). I don’t, however, want to overstate the momentousness of such developments for the Mortgage Finance Bubble as a whole. Some restraint at the margin will only slightly reduce total Mortgage debt growth and somewhat moderate current robust housing inflation.
I can see things initially moving in one of two different directions. The perception of cooling housing markets and consequent mortgage-related vulnerability might very well impel some speculator liquidation of riskier MBS and mortgage instruments, and this could prove a major liquidity inflection point throughout the marketplace for mortgage finance. The mortgage REITs could falter badly, and 1994 and ’98-style mortgage dislocations could materialize. To this point, however, there has been only moderate widening of mortgage spreads, although it appears to have recently somewhat accelerated.
But we should also be mindful of an alternative scenario: Heightened systemic fragility associated with weakening (or the risk of weaker) housing and MBS markets might incite another decline in Treasury yields. One could even envisage an environment where increased stress in certain sectors of mortgage finance (riskier home equity loan ABS and CDOs, and private-label “jumbo” MBS, for example) might actually – by inciting sinking Treasury yields – reduce borrowing costs for more conventional (including 30-year fixed) mortgage loans. Moreover, an unwinding of Mortgage Carry Trades could, potentially, provoke a destabilizing Treasury market rally/dislocation.
I have a difficult time believing that American households are about to all of a sudden wake up one morning and ponder the possibility that housing prices aren’t destined to rise forever. That would defy the nature of manias. The system must instead somehow restrict liquidity from eager real estate borrowers, a development that today does stretch the imagination (with too many livelihoods depend on the perpetuation of lending excess). Importantly, Mortgage-related securities and instruments remain the key asset class for a massive (and still growing!) leveraged speculator community desperate for yield and positive returns. This facet of the analysis is today more fundamental than any housing metric.
Late-stage Credit Bubble dynamics create a fascinating and analytically challenging environment. The massive ongoing Financial Sphere expansion ensures that only more excessive amounts of finance chase increasingly risky/extended borrowers (financing ever more inflated asset prices). The unprecedented influx of players into the mortgage business guaranteed today’s narrowing lending margins, while late-cycle Credit risks grow exponentially (due to leveraged marginal borrowers, minimal downpayments and loose terms, over-building, price inflation, generally maladjusted economy, increasing financial fragility, etc.). All the same, the most prominent influence on lending decisions during this final phase of the boom is the necessity to sustain short-term reported accounting profits (inflated by under-reserving for future, post-Bubble Credit losses). A deteriorating financial backdrop – in this age of unlimited liquidity – ironically spells increased lending volumes, further asset inflation and greater economic distortions.
For the massive leveraged speculating community, too much finance is chasing inflated asset markets and meager little risk premiums. Today and going forward, there is no avoiding the serious dilemma posed by significantly limited opportunities for acceptable returns. There may have in the past been some legitimacy with respect to marketplace “arbitrage” opportunities, but no longer. The Massive Mortgage Carry Trade is a combination Credit spread and the classic borrow-short-lend-long. But borrowing costs are rising, while thin Credit spreads defy escalating Credit risk. Nevertheless, the most prominent influence on today’s speculating decisions is the necessity to achieve positive returns. A deteriorating financial backdrop – in this age of unlimited liquidity – ironically spells only greater speculator leveraging and risk-taking – as we have witnessed.
On many levels, late-stage Credit Bubble dynamics foment powerful liquidity-creating and risk-taking behavior, irrespective of deteriorating underlying fundamentals. This is an essential facet of the analysis of why Monetary Disorder imparts progressively deleterious effects upon the system pricing mechanism, and why such Bubbles end inevitably in busts. Today’s Credit system does not function like the banking system of years past – when bank loan officers and Fed open market operations dictated system liquidity. Can today’s securities and speculator-driven marketplace/Credit system effectively regulate Credit creation and marketplace liquidity? It certainly does not appear that it can. While a spike in yields would abruptly and perhaps radically change liquidity and speculative dynamics, is there some market rate below the crisis point that would stabilize Mortgage Credit excess without bursting the Bubble? I doubt it’s possible.
The bottom line, with regard to Updating the Mortgage Finance Bubble, is that interest rates and marketplace liquidity remain highly accommodative to ongoing dangerous excess. The worst-case scenario continues to play out. As such, the fluid environment beckons for the attentive monitoring of the interplay between the Mortgage Finance Bubble and the Leverage Speculating Bubble.