|    Considering   that the broader market – or at least the Russell 2000 and S&P400 Mid-cap   indices – traded at or near all time highs Wednesday morning, the market   ended the week unimpressively.  For the week, the Dow declined 0.8% and   the S&P500 dipped 0.6%.  The Transports fell 1.8%, and the Utilities   declined 1.1%.  The Morgan Stanley Cyclical index declined 1.1% and the   Morgan Stanley Consumer index fell 0.9%.  Two days of selling pushed the   small cap Russell 2000 to a 2.5% decline for the week.  The S&P400   Mid-cap index dropped 1.7%.  Technology stocks generally outperformed.    The NASDAQ100 was only slightly negative and the Morgan Stanley High Tech   index slightly positive.  The Semiconductors and The Street.com Internet   indices were down less than 1%, and the NASDAQ Telecommunications index   slipped 0.2%.  The Biotechs were resilient, declining about 0.5%.    The Broker/Dealers declined 1.1%, and the Banks fell 1.0%.  With bullion   jumping $7.50, the HUI gold index was up about 4%.  Looks   like a bear.  For the week, two-year Treasury yields jumped 9 basis   points to 4.10%, the highest yield since July 2001.  Five-year   government yields surged 11 basis points to 4.23%, the high since the   late-March price spike.  Ten-year Treasury yields gained 11 basis points   for the week to 4.39%, and long-bond yields jumped 11 basis points to 4.58%.    The spread between 2 and 10-year government yields widened 3 to 29.    Benchmark Fannie Mae MBS yields rose 12 basis points, slightly more than   Treasuries. The spread (to 10-year Treasuries) on Fannie’s 4 5/8% 2014 note   was unchanged at 29, and the spread on Freddie’s 5% 2014 note was unchanged   at 28.  The 10-year dollar swap spread increased .75 to 45.25 (11-week   high).  Corporate bonds continue to trade with narrow spreads to   Treasuries, although auto bond and CDS spreads widened moderately this week.    Junk bond spreads were little changed for the week.  The implied yield   on 3-month December Eurodollars rose 5.5 basis points to 4.32%, while   December ’06 Eurodollar yields jumped 13.5 basis points to 4.635%.      Corporate   issuance rose to $15 billion.  This week’s investment grade issuers   included Wells Fargo $1.0 billion, Merrill Lynch $950 million, Wachovia Bank   $750 million, Regions Financial $750 million, Aiful $500 million, New York   Life $500 million, Key Bank $500 million, Caithness Coso $465 million, PSEG   Funding $460 million, XLLIAC Global Funding $450 million, Domtar $400   million, Thomson $400 million, Amerus Group $300 million, Marsh & Ilsley   $250 million, Hovnanian $300 million, Branch Banking & Trust and Standard   Pacific $175 million.      Junk   bond funds reported outflows of $2.9 million (from AMG).  Junk issuers   included Sirius Satellite $500 million, Acco Brands $350 million, Cardtronics   $200 million, Life Care Holding $150 million, and Stanley-Martin $150   million.      Convert   issuance included Human Genome Sciences $230 million and Lifepoint Hospitals   $200 million.  Foreign   dollar debt issuance included RAS Laffan LNG$2.25 billion and Panama $500   million.  Japanese   10-year JGB yields rose 8 basis points this week to a 4-month high 1.38%.    Emerging debt markets were generally impressive considering the tone of the   Treasury market.  Brazilian benchmark dollar bond yields declined 5   basis points to 7.85%.  Mexican govt. yields rose 8 basis points to   5.58%.  Russian 10-year dollar Eurobond yields increased 4 basis points   to 6.09%.   Freddie   Mac posted 30-year fixed mortgage rates rose 5 basis points to 5.82%, up 29   basis points in five weeks (down 17 basis points from one year ago).    Fifteen-year fixed mortgage rates increased 4 basis points to 5.38%, a   16-week high.  One-year adjustable rates added one basis point to 4.47%,   up 23 basis points in five weeks and 39 basis points higher than a year   earlier.  The Mortgage Bankers Association Purchase Applications Index   rose 1.9% last week to a four-week high.  Purchase applications were up   9.5% compared to one year ago, with dollar volume up 22%.  Refi   applications increased 3%.  The average new Purchase mortgage rose to   $239,400.  The average ARM jumped to $350,500.  The percentage of   ARMs declined to 28.5% of total applications.     Broad   money supply (M3) expanded $12.3 billion to a record $9.761 Trillion (week of   July 25).  Year-to-date, M3 has expanded at a 5.2% growth rate, with   M3-less Money Funds expanding at a 6.5% pace.  For the week, Currency   gained $0.9 billion.  Demand & Checkable Deposits jumped $25.3   billion.  Savings Deposits dropped $27.9 billion. Small Denominated   Deposits added $3.2 billion.  Retail Money Fund deposits slipped $1.4   billion, while Institutional Money Fund deposits rose $10.5 billion.    Large Denominated Deposits increased $5.6 billion.  For the week,   Repurchase Agreements dipped $0.3 billion, and Eurodollar deposits declined   $3.5 billion.                Bank   Credit jumped $18.9 billion last week.  Year-to-date, Bank Credit has   expanded $511.4 billion, or 13.1% annualized, more than the $496 billion   growth during the entire year 2004.  Securities Credit declined   $10.7 billion during the week, with a year-to-date gain of $137.9 billion   (12.5% ann.).  Loans & Leases have expanded at a 13.8% pace so far   during 2005, with Commercial & Industrial (C&I) Loans up an annualized   19.7%.  For the week, C&I loans increased $5.9 billion, and Real   Estate loans expanded $5.0 billion.  Real Estate loans have expanded   at a 15.9% rate during the first 30 weeks of 2005 to $2.774 Trillion.    Real Estate loans were up $374 billion, or 15.4%, over the past 52 weeks.    For the week, Consumer loans increased $7.2 billion, and Securities loans   gained $6.0 billion. Other loans added $5.5 billion.    Total   Commercial Paper surged $32.1 billion last week to $1.577 Trillion (high   since March ’01).  Total CP has expanded $163.6 billion y-t-d, a rate   of 19.4% (up 16.8% over the past 52 weeks).  Financial CP jumped   $30.0 billion last week to $1.435 Trillion, with a y-t-d gain of $150.2   billion (19.6% ann.).  Non-financial CP gained $2.1 billion to $142.9   billion (up 17.4% ann. y-t-d and 9.8% over 52 wks). ABS   issuance was about stable with last week at $11 billion (from JPMorgan).    Year-to-date issuance of $441 billion is 22% ahead of comparable 2004.  Home   Equity Loan ABS issuance of $281 billion is 27% above comparable 2004.  From Merrill Lynch research:  “US Cash CDO issuance is up 76%   YTD 2005 versus the same period in 2004, with YTD volume of $75.1 billion.” Fed   Foreign Holdings of Treasury, Agency Debt added $1.1 billion to $1.455 Trillion   for the week ended August 3.  “Custody” holdings are up $119.4 billion   y-t-d, or 15.0% annualized (up $207bn, or 16.6%, over 52 weeks).    Federal Reserve Credit jumped $5.8 billion to $799.1 billion.  Fed   Credit has expanded 1.8% annualized y-t-d (up $41.5bn, or 5.5%, over 52   weeks).   International   reserve assets (excluding gold) - as accumulated by Bloomberg’s Alex Tanzi -   were up $589 billion, or 17.8%, over the past 12 months to $3.901 Trillion.    Russian reserves are up almost 76% over the past year. August   4 – Bloomberg (Torrey Clark and Marta Srnic):  “Russia’s foreign   currency and gold reserves increased to $144.3 billion as rising oil revenue   helped reversed three weeks of declines. Reserves rose by $2.3 billion in the   week ending July 29…” Currency Watch: Curiously   disregarding rising U.S. yields, the dollar index dropped 1.4% this week.    On the upside, the Czech koruna gained 3.6%, the Brazilian real 2.9%, Swedish   krona 2.7%, Chilean peso 2.5%, and Swiss franc 2.2%.  On the downside,   the Taiwan dollar, Mexican peso, and Argentine peso declined slightly against   the dollar.       Commodities Watch: August   4 – Reuters:  “China’s demand for crude oil will rise about 6 percent   from last year to 310 million tonnes (6.2 million barrels per day) in 2005,   the government estimated in a new survey that underscores weak domestic   consumption data. Domestic crude production in the world's second-largest oil   consumer would only rise 3 percent to 180 million tonnes (3.6 million bpd)…” August   5 – Bloomberg (Gene Laverty):  “Natural-gas futures rose to the highest   in nine months as hot weather forecast for much of the U.S. threatens   additions to winter reserves. Air-conditioner use will average 12 percent   above normal across the U.S. through Aug. 12, according to Weather   Derivatives. Gas inventories, which had been 20 percent above the five-year   average at June 3, had been pared to 7.6 percent above…by last week…” September   crude oil jumped $1.74 to a record $62.31.  For the week, the CRB index   rose 1.5%, increasing y-t-d gains to 11.5%.  The Goldman Sachs   Commodities index surged 3%, with 2005 gains rising to 33.6%.    China Watch: August   4 – AFP:  “Chinese state media has condemned US political intransigence   over oil group CNOOC’s bid for Unocal, saying its opposition calls into   question the free trade dogma Washington often trumpets to the world.  ‘The   high-profile takeover battle demonstrated to the world that the United States   is not a free economy as it claimed to be,’ the official China Daily said in   an editorial.  ‘An asset for sale has not gone to the buyer that most   prized it because of regulatory concerns fuelled by bogus fears and hidden   interests.’  CNOOC…drew heavy fire from Capitol Hill for its attempted   takeover of the United States’ ninth largest oil group… ‘The unprecedented   political opposition that followed the announcement of our proposed   transaction ... was regrettable and unjustified,’ CNOOC said… The China Daily   editorial went on to say that not only had Unocal shareholder interests been   damaged but that the failure would ‘poison the current prevailing mood…” ‘The   explicit message the takeover battle sends to the world is that American   business is defined by political needs… That practice will incur many unknown   costs for foreign investors. In the long run, the casualty will be US   competitiveness if the market is to play second fiddle to protectionism with   political patronage.’” August   5 – Bloomberg (Koh Chin Ling):  “China’s top 30 retailers, including   Shanghai Bailian Group Co., Gome Electrical Appliances Holdings Ltd. and   Carrefour SA, had a 30 percent increase in sales in the first half, the   Ministry of Commerce said.” August   2 – Bloomberg (Zhang Shidong):  “China’s retail sales will grow by 12.7   percent this year, the official Xinhua News Agency reported, citing a   Ministry of Commerce survey and analysis of 600 major consumer products.” Asia Boom Watch: August   3 – Bloomberg (Lily Nonomiya):  “Japan’s manufacturers plan to boost   spending at the fastest pace in 15 years this fiscal year, a report by the   Development Bank of Japan showed. Manufacturers plan to boost spending by   19.8 percent in the year ending March 31…” August   4 – Bloomberg (Cherian Thomas):  “India’s industrial production grew   12.8 percent in June on year, Commerce and Industry Minister Kamal Nath said…    Industry had grown 10.8 percent in May compared with the same month last   year.” August   4 – Bloomberg (Cherian Thomas):  “India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh   said the country needs $150 billion of overseas investment in roads, ports   and other infrastructure in the next eight years to accelerate economic   growth.” August   1 – Bloomberg (Anuchit Nguyen):  “Thai inflation accelerated to a more   than six-year high in July as higher fuel prices made transportation more   expensive, reinforcing expectations the central bank will raise interest   rates further this year. The consumer price index rose 5.3 percent from a   year earlier after climbing 3.8 percent in June…” August   3 – Bloomberg (Stephanie Phang):  “Malaysia’s exports unexpectedly   accelerated in June, boosted by U.S. demand for electronics such as   semiconductors and higher oil shipments to China. Exports rose 11.7 percent   to 44.5 billion ringgit ($11.9 billion) from a year earlier…” August   1 – Bloomberg (Arijit Ghosh and Soraya Permatasari):  “Indonesia’s   inflation rate accelerated in July after the government increased cigarette   prices and a weaker rupiah made imported goods more expensive. Consumer   prices rose 7.8 percent from a year earlier after gaining 7.4 percent in June…” Unbalanced Global Economy Watch: August   3 – Bloomberg (Alexandre Deslongchamps):  “Canadian sales of cars and   light trucks rose 17 percent in July, as offers of employee prices for all   buyers helped General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler AG to   gains of more than 20 percent each.  Sales advanced to 154,830 vehicles   from 132,783 a year earlier…” August   5 – Bloomberg (Laura Humble):  “U.K. house-price inflation slowed to the   lowest in more than nine years in July, HBOS Plc said, after the country’s   economy grew at the slowest annual pace since 1993 in the second quarter.    Prices rose 2.3 percent in the quarter through last month compared with a   year earlier…” August   4 – Bloomberg (Matthew Fletcher):  “U.K. new-car sales fell 6.6 percent   in July, the seventh straight decline this year, after automaker MG Rover   Group Ltd. collapsed and higher interest rates deterred buyers, said the   country's carmaker’s association.” August   5 – Bloomberg (Jeremy van Loon):  “Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, the   world’s largest maker of luxury cars, said worldwide sales in July gained 14   percent as buyers chose new versions of the 3-Series car and new models such   as the X3 sport-utility vehicle.” August   1 – Bloomberg (Tasneem Brogger):  “Danish retail sales rose 1.5 percent   in June from May as falling unemployment and rising consumer confidence   encouraged consumers to spend more on goods including clothes.  Retail   sales rose an annual 7.5 percent…” August   1 – Bloomberg (Trygve Meyer):  “Norwegian domestic borrowing growth in   June accelerated to the highest in almost four years, led by consumer and   business credits. Credit growth for households, companies and municipalities   accelerated to an annual 10.6 percent, the highest since July 2001, from 10.5   percent in May…”  August   4 – Bloomberg (Jonas Bergman):  “Swedish economic growth accelerated in   the second quarter as companies increased investments and falling borrowing   costs fueled consumer spending. The largest Nordic economy grew 0.6 percent   from the first three months and an annual 2.2 percent…” August   4 – Bloomberg (Bradley Cook):  “Russian economic growth probably   accelerated to an annual 6.7 percent in July, the fastest pace in 11 months,   as record oil revenue fuels consumer spending, Moscow Narodny Bank said.    Economic expansion, led by manufacturing and services, accelerated from 5   percent in the first quarter…” August   3 – Bloomberg (Todd Prince):  “Russian millionaires may control as much   as $350 billion, equivalent to about two-thirds of the country’s gross   domestic product, according to Scorpio Partnership, a U.K. wealth-management   firm.” August   4 – Financial Times (Christopher Hitchens ):  “As central Europe basks   in the summer heat, its stock markets are also enjoying their day in the sun:   since mid-May, the region’s three main markets, in Warsaw, Budapest and   Prague, have pushed steadily into record territory, driven by solid corporate   profits and a burst of interest from US-based emerging market funds. In   Warsaw, the region’s largest market, investor interest has concentrated on   blue-chips, sending the WIG20 blue-chip index up 23 per cent since mid-May…   Budapest’s BUX closed at a record high of 21,354 on Tuesday…a rise of 33 per   cent since mid-May and 42 per cent on the year.” August   2 – Bloomberg (Victoria Batchelor and Gemma Daley):  “Australia’s retail   sales increased by the most in two years in June as rising wages and record   employment stoke growth in the Asia-Pacific’s fifth-largest economy. Bonds   dropped and the nation’s currency rose after the statistics bureau said today   retail sales gained 1.3 percent from May. That was more than double the   median forecast of a 0.5 percent…” August   1 – Bloomberg (Dania Saadi):  “Iran, the site of the world’s second-   largest oil and gas reserves, expects to have record oil sales of $40 billion   this year as prices reach an all-time high, the country’s oil minister said.” Latin America Watch: August   5 – Bloomberg (Guillermo Parra-Bernal and Camila Dias):  “Brazil’s   industrial output rose in June at the fastest pace in six months, suggesting   that record exports are tempering a slowdown in South America’s biggest   economy. Output by miners and manufacturers rose 6.3 percent in June from a   year earlier, following a 5.5 percent increase in May…” August   1 – Bloomberg (Katia Cortes):  “Brazil’s trade surplus surged to a   record in July, powered by a jump in the shipment of commodities, such as   soybeans, coffee and tobacco. Brazil’s surplus jumped $980 million in July,   the biggest monthly gain this year, to a record $5 billion from $4 billion in   June…” August 3 – Bloomberg (Daniel Helft): “Argentina’s annual inflation rate rose to a two-year high in July as an increase in government spending sparked a surge in consumer demand. Inflation quickened to 9.6 percent in the 12 months through July from 9 percent in July and 8.6 percent in May…” August   5 – Bloomberg (Heather Walsh):  “Chile’s economy grew faster than 6   percent for a third straight month in June as manufacturers increased output   to fill orders at home and abroad. The economy grew 6.4 percent in June from   a year earlier…” Bubble Economy Watch: August   3 – Bloomberg (Bill Koenig and Barbara Powell):  “General Motors Corp.,   Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler AG, bolstered by employee discounts for   all customers, led the second-biggest month ever for U.S. auto sales. Toyota   Motor Corp., Nissan Motor Co. and Honda Motor Co. also had gains in July.   U.S. auto sales rose to an annualized 20.9 million units in July, compared with   17.2 million a year earlier…” August   3 – The Wall Street Journal (Ryan Chittum):  “Consumers continued   spending in the second quarter, which boosted the retail real-estate market   and drove vacancies in shopping malls to four-year lows and pushed rents up   solidly in strip malls.  Mall vacancies fell to 5.1% on average in the   second quarter from 5.3% in the first quarter, but average rents were flat at   $37.75 a square foot a year (according to Reis Inc.)… Strip-mall vacancies   fell to 6.7% on average in the second quarter from 6.9% in the first quarter…    Absorption…in strip malls was particularly strong in the second quarter,   jumping by 8.7 million square feet, the second-biggest rise in 4 1/2 years.” Speculator Watch: August   3 – Dow Jones (Steven C. Johnson):  “U.S. consumers may be spending at a   record-setting pace, but their appetites have been easily matched by those of   investors, who remain hungry to buy consumer debt - even as risk premiums   approach historic lows.  Global investors are snapping up asset-backed   securities - consumer loans repackaged into new bonds and sold to investors -   just as quickly as banks can issue them. Nearly $30 billion in new securities   have hit the calendar since mid-July, a time when volume usually slows to a   trickle…  This follows a 28% surge in new issuance - from $262 billion   to $335 billion - in the first half of the year, analysts at RBS Greenwich   Capital…reported …” August   4 – Bloomberg (Katherine Burton):  “Multibillion-dollar hedge funds run   by Paul Tudor Jones, Louis Bacon, Bruce Kovner and Barton Biggs boosted   investment returns in July after gaining no more than 1.2 percent in the   first six months of the year. Tudor’s $4 billion Tudor BVI fund returned 3   percent in the year through July 20 and Bacon’s $5 billion Moore Global   Investments gained 2.4 percent, investors said. Biggs’s $1.7 billion Traxis   Fund rose about 2.3 percent and Kovner’s $9.3 billion Caxton Global   Investment fund advanced about 1.8 percent through the end the month.” California Bubble Watch: California   Median Home Prices jumped $19,820 during June to a record $542,720.    Home Prices were up 16% over the past year ($74,670) and 35% over 18 months   ($141,000).  Condo Median Prices were up $13,090 during the month to a   record $433,690.  Condo Prices were up 15.7% over the past year   ($58,740) and 40% over 18 months ($123,640).  Over three years, Home and   Condo Prices were up 67% and 79%, and over six years 142% and 155%.    June Home Sales were up 6% over June 2004, with Condo Sales up 13%.    According to the California Association of Realtors, “Inventory levels in   recent months were nearly double that of a year ago.”  The Unsold   Inventory Index rose to 2.7 months, up from 1.7 one year ago. August   3 – PRNewswire:   “California households, with a median household   income of $53,840, are $70,480 short of the $124,320 qualifying income needed   to purchase a median-priced home at $530,430 in California, according to the   California Association of Realtors Homebuyer Income Gap Index report for the   second quarter of 2005…”   Mortgage Finance Bubble Watch: August   3 – Bloomberg (Kathleen M. Howley):  “Mortgage refinancings in which   borrowers received cash rose 25 percent in the second quarter as interest   rates fell to the lowest level in more than a year. So-called ‘cash-out refis’   rose to $212.3 billion from $169.6 billion in the first quarter, Freddie Mac   said… The cash-out share was 74 percent of all refinancings, a   four-and-a-half-year high…” August   3 – Bloomberg (Kathleen M. Howley):  “The affordability of U.S. homes   dropped to a 14-year low in the second quarter, when prices rose at the   fastest pace in more than a quarter century. The average household had 120.8   percent of the income needed to purchase a property at the median home price   of $208,500, according to a report issued today by the National Association   of Realtors… That share was the lowest since the third quarter of 1991, when   it was 113.7 percent. Prices for existing homes gained 14 percent in the   second quarter from a year earlier, more than at any other time since 1979,   NAR said.” August   2 – Bloomberg (Min Zeng):  “The sale of debt backed by commercial real   estate is on a record pace, bolstered by falling interest rates and rising   property prices, according to Moody’s… Issuance of commercial mortgage-backed   securities, which consist of loans on everything from hotels to office   buildings, rose 65 percent to $72 billion in the first half of the year from   the same period of 2004… The full-year record for issuance was $93 billion,   set in 2004.” August   4 – New York Times (Jennifer Steinhauer):  “It may not replace the   Empire State Building or the MetroCard, but the most fitting symbol of New   York City today could be the knotty plywood wall enclosing a housing   construction site. From Bensonhurst to Morrisania to Flushing, new homes   are going up faster now than they have in more than 30 years. In 2004,   the city approved the construction of 25,208 housing units, more than in any   year since 1972, and that number is expected to be surpassed this year.   Already, officials have authorized 15,870 permits. Looked at another way, the   city has 38 percent of the region’s population but accounts for half of its   new housing starts. Much of that development is being fueled by private   money, a phenomenon not seen since the 1970’s. The mushrooming of   housing development is an outgrowth of the city’s decade-long population   boom, low interest rates, government programs and a slide in crime, housing   experts and city officials say. It has affected every borough and most   neighborhoods… Throughout Brooklyn, in areas where single- and two-family   homes have dominated for generations, six-story buildings are rising on every   other block along some stretches, and their apartments are quickly being   sold, often to first-time buyers. Large tracts of Queens, once home to   factories and power plants, are being readied for apartment complexes… In   East New York, Brooklyn, once known for its crack trade and killings,   single-family homes are rising for the first time in a generation.”  Mortgage   REIT New Century Financial reported better-than-expected earnings but cut   future guidance.  Mortgage lending margins are evaporating, forcing   institutions to go for volume and accept greater risk.  Total Assets   expanded by $4.7 billion during the quarter (87% annualized) to $26.4   billion.  Assets were up 53% from one year ago and have ballooned from   $4.2 billion to end year-2000. The Downside to Transparent Baby Steps: August   1 – Financial Times - Excerpted from Henry Kaufman’s exceptional Op-Ed Piece,   “New Fed Chairman Must Tread an Uncertain Path":  “When a new   chairman of the US Federal Reserve assumes office next year, the transition   will be greeted by great fanfare and widespread market apprehension. He or   she will succeed a long-serving predecessor and one of the most widely known   chairmen in Fed history. The new chairman will also be forced immediately to   confront some knotty domestic and international challenges… The new   chairman will need to make tough judgments on the housing sector. Unfortunately,   the Fed does not yet view this with alarm. It has drawn attention to   isolated instances of exuberance while publicly applauding aggregate data on   housing activity and the financial strength of households. Nevertheless,   household debt has risen sharply, and the grave risks this poses can be   minimised only by low interest rates, rising household income or a   combination of the two. For the new chairman the question will be: can   households continue to serve as a stabilising force in the next recession or   have they already been marginalised by the household debt binge? For their   part, financial markets will watch closely to see if the new chairman   maintains the current tactical monetary approach. Under Alan Greenspan, this   has consisted primarily of two tenets – measured responses to economic   developments and increasing transparency in monetary policy. Since the   inception of this approach several years ago, the central bank has raised its   Federal funds rate 25 basis points after each meeting of the [FMOC].    Fed officials have tried to reassure market participants through frequent   public utterances.  This approach has wrought several unintended   consequences. For one, it has contributed to a massive carry trade…   This is because investors have been conditioned to expect moderate and   steady increases in money rates, which their quantitative analysis shows will   pose limited risks, if any, along the yield curve. This, in turn, has   led them to conclude that the carry trade can be the source of substantial profits…   Although spread compression typically yields smaller profits from carry   trades, profits have remained high as investors have enlarged their   positions. In short, the Fed’s recent monetary approach, combined with   the US Treasury’s practice of confining much of its new borrowing to short-   and intermediate-term notes, explains a great deal of what the Fed has dubbed   a “conundrum”…  The second unintended consequence of the Fed’s   measured response policy has been the massive growth of debt. Investors   have reacted to the assurance of a measured response by borrowing more. In   highly securitised and innovative financial markets, which by themselves   encourage entrepreneurial financial behaviour, rapid debt growth is a natural   consequence of measured response policies…” Mr.   Kaufman is the master.  He may no longer dazzle the markets with his   uncanny ability to forecast interest rates as he did years ago, though this   is no fault of his.  The financial landscape changed profoundly from his   heyday as ace market forecaster, an evolution he so brilliantly   prognosticated in his 1986 book, “Interest Rates, the Markets, and the New   Financial World.” We   do operate these days in a Financial New Age, where limitless Wall Street   finance has completely overturned the traditional dynamic whereby market   rates were determined through the interplay of the supply of savings with the   demand for borrowings.  No longer does Kaufman-style diligent analysis   of financial flows and Credit demand provide an edge in forecasting bond yields   (a contention well supported by the quantities of egg I’ve had to wipe from   my face!).  The game has changed profoundly to “simply” predicting the   Fed’s next move(s).  This is not only a one-heck-of-a-lot-less arduous   endeavor than analyzing the supply and demand for system finance.  It   has, as well, been made far too easy by the Greenspan Fed’s “evolution” to   Transparent Baby Step Monetary Management. There   is no doubt that Fed policy has nurtured leveraged speculation and incited   unprecedented financial leveraging and consumer borrowing, as Mr. Kaufman so   adeptly and concisely articulated.  And there is little doubt that   Transparent Baby Steps was an outgrowth of the fragilities associated with   previous excesses.  The Fed has been highly cognizant of the speculation   and leverage-rife Credit system and an over-indebted economy.  I have   argued that the resulting Fed timidity and accommodation were absolutely the   wrong approach to deal with such a financial and economic backdrop – the   Credit Bubble “blow-off” and deeply maladjusted Bubble Economy.  It has   been a case of policy errors begetting more dangerous mistakes.  The   predictable consequences include precarious asset Bubbles, greater   leveraged speculation, a more debt-laden and vulnerable U.S. economy, acute   system fragility and, increasingly, a much more unstable global Credit boom   backdrop.   When   the Fed nudged rates up 25 basis points a year ago June to 1.25% and made it   clear that it was prepared to delicately reduce accommodation over an extended   period, Street pundits (along with speculators) were afforded free rein.    They relished in theorizing that the Fed had won the long, hard battle   against inflation, while forecasting that the spoils of war would include a   2.50% ceiling for short-term borrowing costs.  Apparently, savers   were no longer deserving of a respectable return, while mortgage borrowers   and the leveraged speculating community were to forever delight in financial   windfall.   Well,   2.5% came and went, yet the analysis steadfastly stayed the same:    Inflation was dead, and the Fed was perpetually almost done.    Furthermore, system fragility would hold Fed tightening at bay, while the “disinflationary”   economy would forever be at the brink of abrupt slowing.  Accordingly,   there was every reason to expect that bond yields would remain   permanently in the cellar (prices in the penthouse suite).  And if   anyone was tempted to wager against bond prices, the emboldened bulls were   tickled at the opportunity to take their money.  One peculiar aspect of   Monetary Disorder was an orderly one-way bond market.  The historic   confluence of unprecedented US household mortgage borrowings, financial   sector leveraging and speculation, and foreign central bank balance sheet   ballooning assured overly-abundant marketplace liquidity to inflate virtually   all asset prices everywhere (and explaining the “conundrum”). I   have (stubbornly) taken the other side of the unavailing inflation “debate,”   arguing that inflation is anything but dead and bond prices anything but a   sure bet.   While intellectually stimulating (at least to me), it   has to this point been a waste of time.  The bulls have steadfastly   fixated on core CPI, low long-term rates, and the flat yield curve, while   scoffing at any analysis bearing inflation as a risk factor.  There has   been no “debate,” but times they are changing.   Market   players will likely continue to trumpet quiescent (narrow) CPI inflation and   completely disregard (broad) Credit inflation.   Yet the bottom   line is that the U.S. economy (and globally to a lesser extent) is in the   midst of a major inflationary boom.  CPI is essentially irrelevant,   while the dynamics of broad inflation in Credit and its myriad Inflationary   Manifestations are the key issue.   Admittedly,   inflation hasn’t mattered to the markets to this point because it hasn’t been   a factor with respect to Fed Transparent Baby Step Monetary Management.    But I think this may have begun to change this week.  The Credit Bubble,   the Mortgage Finance Bubble, the Leveraged Speculation Bubble, and the   Distorted U.S. Bubble Economy have scoffed at the feeble little Baby Step   rate increases.  There has been no tightening – none.  Mortgage   Credit creation is currently at record levels, Credit spreads remain   unusually narrow, markets remain over-liquefied, and easy Credit Availability   has never been as widespread.     With   respect to Credit inflation dynamics, housing inflation has been accommodated   and monetized, in the process nurturing inflating household net worth and   incomes, along with (largely through the resulting Current Account Deficit)   the Commodities Boom and the Energy Boom.  Crude, energy and commodity   price gains have been accommodated and monetized, adding further impetus to   the U.S. Credit and Economic Bubbles, the China/Asia Bubble and emerging   market excesses.  As inflation dynamics have tended to do throughout the   ages, Credit excess begets higher prices that beget only greater Credit   excesses.  Inflation dynamics and (to this point) limitless Wall Street   finance make for a precarious mix.  Perhaps the markets are beginning to   take notice. No   longer are the issues of Inflation, Disinflation and Deflation merely fodder   for intellectual theorizing.  If I am correct – that Credit Inflation   and Inflationary psychology are now firmly embedded in the U.S. Bubble   economy – only significantly higher rates and/or financial crisis will   sufficiently rein in Credit excesses.  Mortgage Credit creation must be   reduced, something made quite challenging by recent housing inflation,   financial innovation, and unparalleled Credit Availability.  The Fed is   certainly hoping to orchestrate a soft-landing for U.S. housing prices.    But, as we witnessed with technology and NASDAQ, it is not the nature of   powerful booms to quietly succumb.  When accommodated, they have an   intense propensity to go to wild extremes only to then collapse. For   sometime now the bulls have enjoyed having a copy of the Fed’s playbook.    This unusual luxury allowed them to create a fanciful world comprised of a   productivity miracle, downward wage pressures, general dis-inflationary   pricing pressures, a global savings glut, world-wide manufacturing   overcapacity, a stable new “Bretton Woods II” global monetary regime and   perpetually low global interest-rates.  And, Thinking Soros, market   perceptions do have a fascinating way of engendering their own reality – for   awhile.  The great bond bull market was granted an extended life, right   along with an Extraordinarily Dangerous Credit Cycle.  As   one would expect, this imaginary nirvana has incited speculation, along with   the unwinding of hedges.  In the process, we have witnessed the type of   wholesale capitulation by bond bears (investors, traders, derivative players,   and pundits alike) consistent with a major market top.  As such, it   would appear that the markets are today unusually susceptible to speculative   de-leveraging and derivative-related dynamic trading strategies.   And,   in regard to “Bretton Woods II,” I will assume that the Chinese today feel   Washington has changed the rules mid-game.  After accumulating $700   billion of reserves, it’s ok for the Chinese to buy Treasuries and MBS.    But we won’t look kindly at our trading “partner” if they use some of those   dollars to buy things we really want and need.   Over   the past year we have watched (1999-like) end-of-cycle excesses throughout   all aspects of mortgage finance – certainly including systemic risky lending   and securitizing, leveraged speculation in various mortgage instruments, and   the ridiculous mortgage REIT Bubble.  The consumer has capitalized on   inflated home equity and spent with reckless abandon.  The combination   of elevated consumption and surplus market liquidity has fostered a huge   (end-of-cycle extrapolation) boom in consumer-related investment spending   (certainly including housing, retail, and restaurants).  Bubble   Economy distortions went to unimaginable extremes, only to have   maladjustments “double.” The   Downside of the lionized Transparent Baby Step Monetary Policy is that it has   significantly postponed necessary monetary tightening and accommodated   further late-cycle Bubble excesses.  New Age thinking may have it that,   since there’s no inflation, the Fed cannot fall behind the curve.  But   Age-Old Credit Inflation Dynamics dictate that the longer boom-time   psychology becomes ingrained in the financial and asset markets; throughout   financial institutions; in businesses, governments and households, the   greater the monetary tightening inevitably required to goad the system back   on a more sustainable course.  It is the case that the longer and more   robust the inflationary boom, the more spectacular and problematic the   unavoidable bust.  The dilemma today is that we are long past the point   of any possibility for an orderly return to stability.  The interest-rate   markets are now faced with the prospect of guessing if the Fed will actually   attempt a true tightening and, if so, how high will rates have to go?     Things   have all the sudden become more challenging for the leveraged player and   bullish bond pundit.  The inflationary boom has become hard to deny and   the fanciful imaginary world increasingly easy to rebut.  |