|    This week the Dow   rallied 1.5% and the S&P500 2.1%. Economically sensitive issues   outperformed. The Transports gained 3.3% (up 17.5% y-t-d), and the   Morgan Stanley Cyclical index rose 2.8% (up 5.6% y-t-d). The Utilities   gained 2.0%, and the Morgan Stanley Consumer index increased 1.7%. The   broader market rallied sharply into quarter end, with the small cap Russell   2000 up 5% and the S&P400 Mid-cap index rising 3.2%. The NASDAQ100   gained 1.6%, and the Morgan Stanley High Tech index rose 1.5%. The   Street.com Internet Index advanced 2.3% and NASDAQ Telecommunications index   1.5%. The Semiconductors declined 0.8%. The Biotechs surged   4.0%. The Broker/Dealers rose 2.8% and the Banks 1.8%. With bullion   rallying $32, the HUI gold index gained 8%. For the week, two-year   Treasury yields dropped 11 bps to 5.15%. Five-year yields fell 11 bps to   5.10%, and bellwether 10-year yields declined 8 bps to 5.14%. Long-bond   yields slipped 6 bps to 5.19%. The 2yr/10yr spread ended the week   inverted one basis point. Benchmark Fannie Mae MBS yields declined 7 bps   to 6.37%, this week slightly underperforming Treasuries. The spread on   Fannie’s 4 5/8% 2014 note ended the week 4 wider at 36, and the spread on   Freddie’s 5% 2014 note 2 wider at 33. The 10-year dollar swap spread   increased 0.25 to 59.0. Corporate bond spreads generally lagged   Treasuries, with junk spreads widening this week. The implied yield on   3-month December ’06 Eurodollars dropped 10 bps to   5.595%.           Investment grade   issuers included Bank of America $800 million, Universal Health Services $250   million and AGL Capital $175 million.  Junk issuers included   Windstream $2.55 billion, Nortel Networks $2.0 billion, Chesapeake Energy   $500 million, Willis North America $300 million, Markwest Energy $200   million, National Mentor Holdings $180 million, Stewart & Stevenson $150   million, WCA Waste Corp $150 million, and US Concrete $85 million.  June 27 – Bloomberg   (Sebastian Boyd): “What started as another winning year for corporate   bonds is now a disaster. Investors lost money on everything from AAA   ranked General Electric Co. and Toyota Motor Corp. to junk-rated NRG Energy   Inc. and leveraged buyout target Kinder Morgan Inc. Bonds sold by companies   lost 1.3 percent on average this year, including interest payments, the worst   since at least 1998, according to…Merrill Lynch…” Convert issuers   included Vector Group $85 million. Foreign dollar debt   issuers included SABMiller $1.75 billion.  Japanese 10-year “JGB”   yields rose 5 bps this week to 1.92%. The Nikkei 225 index rallied 2.5%,   reducing 2006 losses to 3.8%. German 10-year bund yields declined one   basis point to 4.06%. Emerging debt markets and equity markets rallied   sharply. Brazil’s benchmark dollar bond yields sank 25 bps to 7.11%.   Brazil’s Bovespa equity index jumped 5.6%, increasing 2006 gains to   9.4%. Despite nervousness ahead of Sunday’s election, the Mexican Bolsa   rose 3.2% this week (up 7.6% y-t-d). Mexico’s 10-year $ yields dropped   21 bps to 6.39%. Russian 10-year dollar Eurobond yields declined 2 bps to   7.03%. The Russian RTS equities index surged 11%, increasing 2006 gains   to 33% and 52-week gains to 112%. India’s Sensex equities index rose 2%   (up 13% y-t-d).  Freddie Mac posted   30-year fixed mortgage rates rose 7 bps to 6.78%, up 15 bps in two weeks and   125 basis points from one year ago. Fifteen-year fixed mortgage rates   jumped 7 bps to 6.43%, 131 bps higher than a year earlier.  One-year   adjustable rates increased 7 bps to 5.82%, an increase of 158 bps over the   past year. The Mortgage Bankers Association Purchase Applications Index   dropped 6.2% this week. Purchase Applications were down 18.2% from one   year ago, with dollar volume down 17.7%. Refi applications fell 7.5%   last week. The average new Purchase mortgage rose slightly to $225,100,   while the average ARM gained to $341,800. Bank Credit declined   $9.9 billion last week to $7.930 Trillion, with a y-t-d gain of $424 billion,   or 11.7% annualized. Bank Credit inflated   $698 billion, or 9.7% over 52 weeks. For the week, Securities Credit   declined $13.2 billion. Loans & Leases added $3.3 billion during the   week, and are up $270 billion y-t-d (10.3% annualized). Commercial   & Industrial (C&I) Loans have expanded at a 13.7% rate y-t-d and   12.5% over the past year. For the week, C&I loans dropped $6.7   billion, while Real Estate loans surged $20.7 billion. Real Estate   loans have expanded at a 13.2% rate y-t-d and were up 13.1% during the past   52 weeks. For the week, Consumer loans sank $17.6 billion, while   Securities loans added $2.4 billion. Other loans gained $4.4 billion. On the   liability side, (previous M3 component) Large Time Deposits increased $6.4   billion.     M2 (narrow) “money”   supply jumped $27.4 billion to $6.833 Trillion (week of June   19). Year-to-date, narrow “money” has expanded $144 billion, or 4.5%   annualized. Over 52 weeks, M2 has inflated $306 billion, or   4.7%. For the week, Currency added $100 million. Demand &   Checkable Deposits declined $2.1 billion. Savings Deposits jumped $15.4   billion (3-wk gain of $45.5bn), and Small Denominated Deposits increased $4.7   billion. Retail Money Fund assets rose $9.2 billion. Total Money Market Fund   Assets, as reported by the Investment Company Institute, were up $10.6   billion last week to $2.117 Trillion. Money Fund Assets have increased   $60 billion y-t-d, or 5.8% annualized, with a one-year gain of $222   billion (11.7%).  Total Commercial Paper   increased $7.8 billion last week to $1.785 Trillion. Total CP is up $136   billion y-t-d, or 16.5% annualized, while having expanded $243 billion over   the past 52 weeks (15.7%).  Asset-backed Securities   (ABS) issuance slowed to a pre-holiday level of $12 billion this week. Year-to-date   total ABS issuance of $374 billion (tallied by JPMorgan) is running just   under 2005’s record pace, with y-t-d Home Equity Loan ABS sales of $266   billion at 9% above last year. Fed Foreign Holdings of   Treasury, Agency Debt (“US marketable securities held by the NY Fed in   custody for foreign official and international accounts”) increased $0.8   billion to a record $1.638 Trillion for the week ended June 28th. “Custody”   holdings are up $119 billion y-t-d, or 15.7% annualized, and $198 billion   (13.8%) over the past 52 weeks. Federal Reserve Credit dipped $1.1   billion to $825 billion. Fed Credit has declined $1.7 billion y-t-d, or   0.4% annualized. Fed Credit is up 4.6% ($36bn) during the past   year.  International reserve   assets (excluding gold) - as accumulated by Bloomberg’s Andy Burt – are up   $453 billion y-t-d (22% annualized) and $616 billion (16%) in the past year   to $4.50 Trillion.  June 28 – Bloomberg   (Jianguo Jiang): “China’s foreign exchange reserves rose to $925 billion   by the end of May, China Business News said, citing Zhang Ji, deputy director   general…at the Ministry of Commerce. Reserves increased by $30 billion in May…” Currency Watch: The dollar index sank   1.8%.  On the upside, the Turkish lira jumped 7.6%, the Romanian leu 4%,   the South African rand 3.5%, the Polish zloty 3.4% and the Brazilian real   3.1%. On the downside, the Argentine peso slipped 0.2% and the Costa Rican   colon 0.1%.  Commodities Watch: Commodities ended the   quarter with an impressive rally. Gold rose 5.5% to $615.45, and Silver   jumped 6.9% to $10.96. Copper gained 6.6%. August crude surged   $3.06 to $73.93. July Unleaded Gasoline rose 3.5%, while July Natural   Gas dipped 2.0%. For the week, the CRB index gained 3.4% (y-t-d up   4.4%). The Goldman Sachs Commodities Index (GSCI) rose 3.5%, increasing   y-t-d gains to 12.3%.      Japan Watch: June 30 – Bloomberg   (Jason Clenfield): “Japan’s unemployment rate fell to a seven-year low   in May, adding to expectations that wage growth will accelerate and drive   consumer spending, which accounts for more than half of the economy. The   jobless rate dropped for a fourth month to 4.0 percent…” China Watch: June 29 – Bloomberg   (Christina Soon): “China’s exporters are increasingly using non-dollar   currencies for settlement to reduce foreign-exchange risks, China   International Business Daily reported. The companies are also raising   export prices and using hedging tools to lower the risk of currency   fluctuations…” June 30 – Bloomberg   (Wing-Gar Cheng and Ying Lou): “China, the world’s second-biggest energy   user, raised electricity prices for the first time in more than a year to   help power companies pass on the higher cost of coal. Huaneng Power   International Inc., the nation’s biggest generator, today raised tariffs as   much as 7.3 percent.” Asia Boom Watch: June 29 – Bloomberg (Kim Kyoungwha): “South Korea’s 2006 economic growth may fall short of the central bank’s 5 percent forecast because of rising oil prices and a strengthening currency, Governor Lee Seong Tae said.” June 26 – Bloomberg   (Kenneth Wong): “Taiwan’s economy will grow more than 4 percent this   year, helped by overseas demand for the island’s exports, said George Chou,   head of the central bank’s foreign exchange department.” June 27 – Bloomberg   (Angus Whitley): “Malaysia’s economy is expected to expand 6 percent   this year, said Second Finance Minister Nor Mohamed Yakcop… The economy grew   5.2 percent last year.” Unbalanced Global   Economy Watch: June 27 – Financial   Times (Chris Giles): “Spending on healthcare systems in advanced   countries is rising so quickly that tax rises, cuts in other areas or   enforced private expenditure will be required to maintain healthcare systems,   the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development said… The   Paris-based international organisation found that between 1990 and 2004,   expenditure on health - public and private - rose faster than gross domestic   product in all its 30 member countries except Finland.” June 30 – Globe &   Mail (Carolyn Leitch): “The average price of a residential home in   Canada jumped surged 13.1 per cent to a record $284,620 in May, according to   sales tracked…by the Canadian Real Estate Association. May was also the   fifth consecutive month in which year-over-year price growth exceeded 10 per   cent… The 13.1 per cent year-over-year price increase was the largest since   October, 2002.” June 28 – Bloomberg   (Brian Swint): “An index of U.K. retail sales held at the highest in a   year and a half in June, bolstered by the World Cup soccer tournament and the   housing market.” June 30 – Financial   Times (Ralph Atkins): “Soaring eurozone private sector borrowing and   money supply figures yesterday gave extra ammunition to European Central Bank   hardliners in the battle against inflation… The latest data,   highlighting the robustness of the eurozone’s economic up-swing, will   exacerbate ECB fears about the distortions caused by low interest rates… Lending   to the private sector grew by 11.4 per cent in May, unchanged from April, but   otherwise the fastest since late 1989…” June 29 – Bloomberg   (Simone Meier): “Money-supply growth in the dozen nations sharing the   euro accelerated in May, expanding at the fastest pace since early 2003  after three interest-rate increases by the European Central Bank. M3, the   ECB’s preferred measure of money supply, rose 8.9 percent from a year   earlier, the fastest pace since April 2003, after gaining a revised 8.7   percent in April…” June 30 – Bloomberg   (Simon Kennedy): “European executive and consumer confidence jumped to a   five-year high in June and inflation was faster than expected, fueling   speculation the European Central Bank may accelerate the pace of   interest-rate increases.” June 28 – Bloomberg   (Matthew Brockett): “Consumer confidence in Germany, Europe’s largest   economy, rose to the highest in almost five years as households showed a   greater willingness to spend.” June 28 – Financial   Times (Ralph Atkins): “German business sentiment has hit a 15-year high   and led a surge in confidence across the eurozone, according to surveys   yesterday.  The unexpected rise in the Munich-based Ifo institute’s   business climate index… suggests that the industrial revival in Europe’s largest   economy might have gathered pace. Separate Italian and Dutch surveys   showed business sentiment at the highest levels since the end of   2000… Global financial markets might be fretting about a possible world   slowdown but ‘Europe is holding up very nicely and if anything there is a   slight acceleration’, said Erik Nielsen, economist at Goldman Sachs.” June 27 – Bloomberg   (Gabi Thesing): “Import price inflation in Germany, Europe’s largest   economy, accelerated the fastest pace in almost six years in May, driven by   increased costs for oil and other raw materials. The cost of foreign   goods rose 7.5 percent from a year earlier…” June 29 – Bloomberg   (Sandrine Rastello): “French unemployment declined more than expected in   May to the lowest level in more than 3 ½ years as faster growth helped create   jobs and the government stepped up subsidies to spur hiring… The jobless rate   slid to 9.1 percent…” June 30 – Bloomberg   (Fergal O’Brien): “Irish lending growth expanded at the fastest pace in   more than six years in May, led by borrowing by companies and demand for   mortgages. Lending rose an annual 29.8 percent, the highest since March   2000…” June 26 – Bloomberg   (Alice Ratcliffe): “Swiss retail sales rose the most on record in April,   helped by a falling unemployment rate and increased spending before the   Easter holidays. Sales rose 12.2 percent from a year earlier…” June 29 – Bloomberg   (Alice Ratcliffe): “Switzerland raised its economic growth forecast for   the fourth time since October, and inflation accelerated to the fastest pace   in five years in June, adding to the central bank’s case for another interest   rate increase. Gross domestic product will probably expand 2.7 this year…” June 26 – Bloomberg   (Ben Sills): “Producer price inflation in Spain, Europe’s fifth-largest   economy, unexpectedly accelerated in May to its fastest pace in 11   years. The price of goods leaving factories, farms and mines rose 6.5   percent from a year earlier…”  June 29 – Bloomberg   (Tasneem Brogger): “Denmark’s jobless rate dropped more than expected in   May to the lowest in more than 30 years as companies struggle to find   qualified workers. The seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate fell to 4.5   percent in May from 4.8 in April…” June 30 – Bloomberg   (Tasneem Brogger): “Danish industrial optimism reached the highest since   September 2000 as manufacturing companies expect rising production as growth   in Europe picks up.” June 29 – Bloomberg   (Tasneem Brogger): “Norway’s domestic credit growth was unchanged in   May, near March’s 18-year high, adding to pressure on the central bank to   raise interest rates. Credit for households, companies and   municipalities rose an annual 13.7 percent…” June 29 – Bloomberg   (Tasneem Brogger): “Norwegian retail sales surged 3.7 percent in May   from a month earlier, more than expected, fueling expectations that the   central bank will continue raising interest rates to cool the economy. Retail   sales rose 6.7 percent from a year earlier…” June 26 – Bloomberg   (Tasneem Brogger): “Sweden’s trade surplus widened 31 percent in May   from a year earlier, more than expected, as export growth outpaced rising   imports. The surplus grew to 15.4 billion kronor ($2.10 billion)…” June 29 – Bloomberg   (Ville Heiskanen): “Finnish retail sales picked up in May after growing   at the slowest pace in nine months in April, supported by rising wages and   higher consumer confidence. Sales rose an annual 6.7 percent…” June 30 – Financial   Times (Neil Buckley): “Memories of Russia’s default on $40bn of domestic   debt eight years ago, when people queued outside banks to withdraw roubles   that were plummeting in value, have barely faded from the national   psyche. Yet, remarkably, with coffers swollen by oil selling at $70 a   barrel, Russia will tomorrow lift all currency controls on the rouble and   make it fully convertible.” June 26 – Bloomberg   (Aaron Pan): “Moscow and Seoul leapfrogged Tokyo to become the world’s   most expensive cities, a survey by Mercer Human Resource Consulting showed.   Tokyo, which ranked first in the past two years, dropped to third place.” June 27 – Bloomberg   (Bradley Cook): “Russia’s economy will probably expand 6.5 percent this   year, Interfax said, citing the International Monetary Fund…” June 29 – Bloomberg   (Tracy Withers): “New Zealand consumer borrowing for housing and consumption   rose 14.1 percent in May from a year earlier, the slowest annual pace since   August 2003…” Latin America Watch: June 30 – Bloomberg   (Adriana Arai): “Mexico posted a budget surplus of 31.2 billion pesos   ($2.75 billion) in May as higher prices for crude oil exports boosted   revenue. Revenue rose 17.8 percent last month from a year earlier,   adjusted for inflation, as spending grew 17.5 percent…” June 27 – Bloomberg   (Eliana Raszewski): “Argentina’s supermarket sales by volume rose 8.9   percent in May from a year earlier, the National Statistics Institute said.” June 29 – Bloomberg   (Daniel Helft):  “Argentina’s jobless rate fell below 10 percent in May   for the first time since October 1993, President Nestor Kirchner said.” June 29 – Bloomberg (Daniel   Helft): “Argentina’s trade surplus widened in May to $1.3 billion from   $1.2 billion in the same period last year… Exports were $4.2 billion, up 13   percent…while imports totaled $2.8 billion, up 14 percent…[y-o-y]…” Central Bank Watch: June 27 – Financial   Times (Chris Giles): “Central banks will have to move faster to raise   interest rates because global inflationary pressures are rising and the   economy remains vulnerable to a ‘bang’ of market turbulence, the Bank of   International Settlements warned yesterday. Raising the spectre of   stagflation - the twin perils of slow economic growth alongside higher   inflation - the central bankers’ bank highlighted the threats that now exist   after global interest rates have been ‘unusually low for an unusually long   time’.” June 27 – Bloomberg   (Matthew Brockett): “European Central Bank council member Nicholas   Garganas said the bank is ready to accelerate the pace of interest-rate   increases to counter higher inflation risks… ‘Should the need be for a   more aggressive interest-rate adjustment, there is nothing to stop us from   taking that decision. I would not rule out a higher adjustment to rates   than 25 basis points,’ nor quickening the pace of increases from once every   quarter…” June 28 – Bloomberg   (Tasneem Brogger): “Sweden’s central Bank may raise interest rates more   than warranted by inflation as it tries to slow soaring house prices and   borrowing, Deputy Governor Eva Srejber said. ‘To reduce the risk of   imbalances building up, we can choose to raise the interest rate slightly   more quickly than is warranted by the inflation forecasts,’ Srejber said…” June 29 – Bloomberg   (Nipa Piboontanasawat and Theresa Tang): “Taiwan’s central bank raised   its benchmark interest rate for an eighth straight time to the highest in   almost five years, and suggested more increases may come. …The island’s   central bank, increased the discount rate on 10-day loans to banks by an   eighth of a percentage point to 2.5 percent…” June 28 – Bloomberg   (Ben Holland): “Turkey’s central bank increased its overnight lending   rate by 200 basis points and borrowed more liras from the market as it seeks   to halt a slide in the currency. The Ankara-based bank increased the   rate to 22.25 percent…” Bubble Economy Watch: May Personal Income was   up 5.4% from a year ago, with Personal Spending up 6.7%. The Chicago   Purchasing Managers Prices Paid index rose to an 18-year high. June 29 – Econoplay.com   (Gary Rosenberger): “Staffing firms, many of whom were bracing for a   summer slowdown, are reporting better-than-expected June orders – and   foresee “stable” demand for workers in the third quarter despite copious   strains on the economy. Recruiters specializing in finance and   accounting, non-residential construction, light industrial, energy, and   office clerical continue to see firm orders…  But there are downsides   from housing-related industries like mortgage lending and from companies   exposed to the travails of domestic automotive…   Wage pressures   are on an upswing – with higher fuel costs and mortgage payments   providing strong rationales for pay increases at a time when companies are   having an easier time passing increased operating costs to their customers.” Real Estate Bubble   Watch: May Existing Home Sales   met expectations at a 6.67 million annualized rate. Sales were down 6.6%   from one year ago, while Average Prices were up 4.1% y-o-y to   $276,100. Annualized Calculated Transaction Value (CTV) was at the   strongest rate since last November, although down 2.7% y-o-y to $1.842   Trillion. Year-to-date Existing Home Sales are running 3.8% behind 2005,   although y-t-d CTV is 1.2% ahead. May New Home Sales were a   stronger-than-expected annualized 1.34 million. This was down 5.9% from   May 2005, while Average Prices were up 2.4% to $294,300. Year-to-date   New Home Sales are running 9.6% below last year’s record level. Total   Home Sales are running 4.7% below last year’s record rate, although y-t-d   combined CTV is about flat with comparable 2005. The Inventory of unsold   Existing Homes jumped to 3.604 million (6.5 months worth!), up 40% in twelve   months. The Inventory of New Homes dipped slightly to 556,000, although   the level remains 24% higher than a year ago. June 28 – Wall Street   Journal (John M. Biers): “The lunch was a soggy chicken and rice combo,   but the commentary was colorful: hottest real-estate market in the nation;   best city for job growth; surging metropolis poised to add two million more   residents. The euphoria at a recent gathering of commercial real-estate   developers reflects the growing confidence in Houston, thanks to persistently   high energy prices. ‘Whether you realize it or not, these are boom   times’ said longtime developer E.D. Wulfe…” June 28 – Bloomberg   (Kathleen M. Howley and Joseph Richter): “Ko Ueno, a 36-year-old tourism   executive moving to San Diego, hasn’t found a buyer for his one-bedroom   condominium in Cambridge, Massachusetts -- even after cutting the price three   times since October and offering a $6,000 cash rebate. ‘A year ago, this   unit would have gone in a matter of days, but now we have to offer incentives   and a brand-new kitchen,’ his broker, Brenda van der Merwe, says… Ueno,   whose apartment near Harvard University went on the market for $329,000 and   is now listed at $299,000, is caught in the first U.S. housing decline since 1999.” June 27 –   PRNewswire: “May home sales remain strong in Illinois, posting the   second highest number on record for total sales in the month. According to   the Illinois Association of Realtors…in May total homes sales were down 2.2   percent to 17,442 homes sold, compared to the previous record for the month   of 17,840 homes sold in May 2005. Year-to-date home sales totaled 66,161 in   2006, off 1.3 percent…” Global Financial   Sphere Bubble Watch: June 30 – Financial   Times (Lina Saigol): “Merger and acquisition activity worldwide is   set to reach $1,930bn for the first half of the year, marking the highest   half-year volume on record and surpassing even the heady days of the dotcom   boom. The unprecedented wave of deals by companies and private   equity has been fuelled by growing executive confidence, a tide of competing   bids, increasingly aggressive shareholder activists and low borrowing   costs. ‘The corporates are in rude health with strong balance   sheets...In the absence of a major collapse of the credit markets, this level   of activity looks set to continue,” said Gavin MacDonald, European head of   M&A. at Morgan Stanley.” June 30 – Financial   Times (Joanna Chung): “A record number of billion-dollar deals pushed   the size of the global market for initial public offerings in the first half   of the year to more than $100bn – second only to the first half of 2000 at   the height of the dotcom boom. Some of the biggest deals were priced   in the second quarter, before the recent downturn. For the first six   months of the year, the volume of IPOs jumped 56 per cent to $102.2bn, from   $65.4bn over the same period in 2005, according to…Dealogic.”  June 27 – Wall Street   Journal (Dennis K. Berman and Jason Singer): “There’s no end in sight   for this year’s parade of megamergers. In less than 100 hours starting   last Friday, around $110 billion in acquisition deals were sealed world-wide   in sectors ranging from natural gas, to copper, to mouthwash to steel,   linking investors and industrialists from India, to Canada, to Luxembourg to the   U.S. The deals…provided striking evidence that 2006 is on pace to be the   most-active merger year in history, as measured in absolute dollars. The   year-end tally could top $3.5 trillion, based on Thomson Financial   figures. As was the case during the merger frenzies of the 1980s and the   1990s, the latest boom is being fueled by abundant credit, changes in   technology and global competition.” June 27 – Bloomberg   (Charlotte Nugent): “Sales of U.S. commercial mortgage-backed securities   totaled a record $12 billion last week, helping new issues surpass $80   billion this year, according to RBS Greenwich Capital Markets.” June 29 – Bloomberg   (John Glover): “Convertible bond sales almost doubled so far this year   as higher interest rates and larger swings in share prices made them more   lucrative for borrowers and buyers. Companies issued $60 billion of the   debt this year, up from $36.1 billion in the first half of 2005…” Energy and Crude   Liquidity Watch: June 26 – Bloomberg   (Ben Sills): “Everywhere you look these days, people are scrambling for   energy supplies. China is scouring the world, from the oil sands of   Alberta to the oilfields of Iran. Morgan Stanley and other investment banks   have spent hundreds of millions of dollars for petroleum still in the ground.   And more than 450 hedge funds (and counting) are busy in the energy market,   trading in everything from coal to solar-power companies.” June 29 – Financial   Times (Roula Khalaf ): “Gulf governments have more than trebled   investment in domestic infrastructure projects, buoyed by more than $70 a   barrel oil prices and driven by a desire to diversify their economies away   from hydrocarbons. The scale of the investments points to growing confidence   among Arab oil producers that crude prices will remain strong for   years. Middle East Economic Digest, which tracks projects in the region,   says current or planned investments exceeded $1,000bn in April, up from   $277bn 18 months before. Vast sums of petrodollars are being recycled   overseas but economists say the emerging trend in the present oil boom is a   greater focus on investing at home… The World Bank says Middle East oil   exporters’ current account surpluses rose from an average of only 6 per cent   of gross domestic product in 2002 to almost 23 per cent in 2005. As they   start spending the windfall, billions of dollars are earmarked for upgrading   infrastructure and increasing production in the oil and gas sectors.” June 29 – Financial   Times (Roula Khalaf ): “Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah criss-crossed the   kingdom in recent weeks, unveiling at every stop generous promises and new   projects. He laid the foundation stone for a university in Qassim…; announced   the construction of an economic city in the holy city of Madinah; and vowed   to build another in Hail, with industries, an education zone and an   airport... The 82-year-old monarch’s tour…may have been intended to   project government largesse at a time of massive oil wealth but depressed   spirits. Many Saudis have just seen their wealth disappear in a meltdown on   the Riyadh stock market. But the infrastructure binge… also reflects new   confidence that oil prices will remain strong… Until recently reluctant to   raise spending, the world’s largest oil producer is hoping to exploit the   windfall from the $70 per barrel oil price to diversify the economy and bring   down an unemployment rate…” June 26 – Bloomberg   (Claudia Maedler): “Trade in the Persian Gulf emirate of Dubai grew 36   percent to 480 billion dirhams ($130 billion) last year, the Khaleej Times   reported.” June 26 – Bloomberg   (Elisa Martinuzzi and Todd Prince): “OAO Rosneft, Russia’s state oil   company, plans to raise as much as $11.6 billion in an initial public   offering that would be the world’s fourth-biggest, gaining funds to boost   output as the government cuts its stake.” Fiscal Watch: June 29 – Financial   Times: “Overall entitlement spending is set to rise from 8.7% of GDP in   2006 to 20% by 2030 - roughly the share taken up by all spending   today. To underline the consequences of inaction, Standard and Poor’s recently   said US treasury bonds would be downgraded to BBB by 2020. Forestalling what   would be a disaster for the US and the world should be Mr Bush’s priority in   the remainder of his term. Establishing a bipartisan commission to look into   both entitlement reform and taxes - as moderate Democrats and Republicans   have urged - would be a good start. Given Washington’s charged atmosphere   nowadays, that might be difficult. But the new treasury secretary is   respected on all sides. He should use that goodwill to start laying the   groundwork for America’s long-term fiscal sanity…” June 28 – Congress   Daily (Peter Cohen): “The overall cost of the wars in Iraq and   Afghanistan and other global anti-terror operations since the Sept. 11, 2001,   attacks will top $500 billion next year, according to congressional estimates   and expectations of future funding.  The nonpartisan Congressional   Research Service said in a report that through the current fiscal year ending   Sept. 30, the government will have spent $437 billion on overseas military   and foreign aid funding.” June 27 – Associated   Press: “The annual cost of replacing, repairing and upgrading Army   equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan is expected to more than triple next year   to more than $17 billion, according to Army documents… From 2002 to 2006, the Army spent an average of $4 billion a year in annual equipment costs. But as the war takes a harder toll on the military, that number is projected to balloon to more than $12 billion for the federal budget year that starts next Oct. 1…” Reality Check: The Fed is confused;   Washington policymakers are confused; the markets trade confused; and pundits   certainly speak as if they are confused. Truth be told, the current fixation   on every word and nuance from the FOMC has become a farce - a mere heedless   distraction from the critical financial/economic issues of the   day. Clearly, the Fed lacks a policy/analytical framework other than   mindlessly reciting its commitment to “fight inflation”. It’s   institutional “brain” has been corroded by an extended period of concurrent   relatively stable “core” inflation and extraordinary asset inflation, not to   mention years of Greenspan obfuscation.  The Federal Reserve is   simply not institutionally prepared for the unfolding challenging environment,   although the same could be said for policymakers and the public   generally. The Fed is left floundering in the shallowest of central   banking doctrine, bereft of any substance as to the key underlying forces   driving the economy, the markets and, increasingly, inflationary   pressures. At the same time, the Fed’s benign neglect of Credit Bubble   excesses is buttressed by the view from the White House to the Halls of   Congress that domestic and international growth are the only avenues for   rectifying imbalances. It’s quite dangerous dogma, yet the markets are   happy to play along. The Bernanke Fed today   plays a dangerous game of sheep in wolf’s clothing, talking tough on (“core”)   inflation while praying it can stay soft on excess. Highly speculative   marketplaces at home and abroad savor in the gamesmanship. Markets   recognize that the Fed will now talk the talk when speculative excess pushes   the envelope, although they remain confident that the Fed will obediently   retreat when markets come under sufficient pressure. Participants simply   wait patiently for a signal from the Fed – as they believe they received   yesterday – and get right back to their business. I do read commentary   that the Fed and global central bankers have been “withdrawing   liquidity.” I don’t see it. For starters, the vast majority of   global liquidity these days emanates from private-sector debt growth and   securities leveraging.  Keep in mind that Credit is growing at   double-digit rates across the globe.  The Federal Reserve’s balance   sheet has become virtually irrelevant to the global liquidity-creation   process, and the Fed has not been selling securities to reduce liquidity in   the system (and they would have to sell a large amount today to offset record   Credit growth!). For central banks to actually “tighten” policy would   require an overall global rate environment sufficiently restrictive to induce   private borrowing and leveraging restraint.  I’m still waiting.  The Fed does, however,   hold (held?) a potentially powerful “stick” over the marketplace. It   maintains the capacity to surprise the markets with more aggressive rate   hikes, which would likely entail significant Credit market disruption and   speculator de-leveraging. At times, this threat can be quite effective   in dousing greed and instilling some fear in frothy global equity and   commodities markets. But I believe it is important to differentiate this   dynamic from the actual tightening of general liquidity conditions for   markets and Credit systems.  Credit markets are much better indicators   of the prevailing liquidity backdrop than equities.  Not only might the   Fed’s potential “stick” not cajole lenders and Credit market participants   into restraint, it may very well even embolden them with the view that market   turbulence will hold the timid Bernanke Fed at bay. Furthermore, the   potential “stick” will lose much of its effectiveness over time. The Fed   will be less willing to be seen as rattling markets, while inspirited market   players will be much more willing to call the Bernanke Fed’s bluff. The   stick loses all its punch come the perception that it will not be   used. And the sophisticated players are definitely keen to Dr.   Bernanke’s well-documented repugnance to “Bubble popping,” and they must   today relish that initial missteps have spurred the new chairman to kowtow to   the markets. I feel compelled to   remind readers of the abbreviated period of time between the near   "seizing up" of global Credit markets in October 1998 and   the historic Internet/technology Bubble of 1999/2000. To be sure, powerful   inflationary biases had engulfed both the Credit system and the greater   technology industry by 1998. But fearing market tumult, the Fed was   unwilling to impose sufficient restraint. Speculative markets will   invariably take full advantage. And it is worth noting that today’s   inflationary biases are more powerful, broader and clearly global in scope,   yet the Fed again appears Wedded to Interminable Acquiescence. For the   most part, the markets are happy to pretend there is no inflation problem. Amazingly,   a few pound the deflation drum as loud as ever. So, if there were ever   a time to step back, take a deep breath, and do a Reality Check -  it’s   right now. We all read and hear assertions that the Fed is overshooting   and inflation is not a serious issue today - and certainly won’t be a   problem when the economy slows (that for some time has been right around the   corner when housing markets and consumption weaken). This is a myopic   view certainly not atypical in the face of changing environments and key inflection   points. It does, however, completely disregard a growing list of   potentially momentous developments with respect to the future inflationary   backdrop.    I suggest this evening   that prospects for an unexpected upsurge in intermediate-term inflation risk   is high due to an extraordinary confluence of major developments, including   unfolding constraints on supply and rising global demand for energy and other   commodities; spiraling healthcare costs, especially for baby-boomer retirees;   various wars, including the ongoing “war on terror”; untenable government   liabilities; and myriad issues related to global warming - to mention just a   few. Unless the Credit system buckles, there are endless sources of   demand for finance waiting in the wings, regardless of the housing market. I certainly won’t be   able to delve much below the surface on any of these issues this evening, but   it is the confluence of developments I hope readers will ponder. Yet   another week of extraordinary weather catastrophe should help convince a few   more global warming fence-sitters. This week from President Bush: “I   have said consistently that global warming is a serious problem. There’s a   debate over whether it’s manmade or naturally caused. We ought to get   beyond that debate and start implementing the technologies necessary to   enable us to achieve a couple of big objectives: One, be good stewards of the   environment; two, become less dependent on foreign sources of oil, for   economic reasons as for national security reasons.”  No matter where readers   stand on this regrettably contentious issue, I strongly suggest viewing Al   Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth.” The potential impact of global warming   on our economy, financial markets and, most importantly, our lives is at this   point simply too important to ignore or dismiss. The film lays out the   issues clearly, and a thorough public debate – certainly directed by leading   scientists - is much overdue.  Ideology needs to stay out of it. The costs of life and   property from a single storm can, as Katrina showed, be enormous. Much   of this cost will be absorbed by government debt or, more aptly stated,   “monetized”. The cost to repair and maintain our gulf energy   infrastructure has been and will likely remain enormous on an ongoing basis. Meanwhile,   the insurance industry lacks the wherewithal to deal with major weather   disasters that could now become “routine”, so the burden will largely fall   upon additional government debt issuance.  We are already seeing the   surging price of insurance along the coasts, although the much greater   potential costs associated with climate change will remain impossible to   quantify. As an aside, the warmest Dallas winter on record forced us to   run air conditioning throughout the “cold” season, and we now watch the local   corn crop succumb to a problematic drought.  Much more problematic   than the SUV predicament, millions of super-sized homes have been built in   some of the hottest climates. It will now be a case of waiting to see   the scope of the financial burden required to keep homes and business   sufficiently cool. We are already seeing the effects of surging energy   costs on the pattern of consumer spending, and it is not out of the question   that the economic viability of certain cities (Las Vegas and Phoenix come to mind)   could be threatened in the event of a major energy shortage/price   spike. The availability of sufficient water will surely become an issue   for the Southwest U.S. and elsewhere. June 26 – Bloomberg   (Saijel Kishan and Madelene Pearson): “Jean-Marie Messier lost billions   of euros turning the world’s biggest water company into entertainment   conglomerate Vivendi Universal SA. He should have stuck with water. The lack   of usable water worldwide has made it more valuable than oil. The Bloomberg   World Water Index of 11 utilities returned 35 percent annually since 2003,   compared with 29 percent for oil and gas stocks and 10 percent for the   S&P 500 Index. From hedge fund manager Boone Pickens to buyout specialist   Guy Hands, the world’s biggest investors are choosing water as the commodity   that may appreciate the most in the next several decades.” At this point, it   appears certain that we are in the early stages of an enormous spending boom   necessary to deal with the rapidly changing energy and climate   backdrop. The scope of the required research and development could be   unprecedented. The investment boom throughout the energy and alternative   energy sectors appears poised to rival (and likely exceed) the technology   boom. The auto companies will need to gear up to develop and sell   smaller, more fuel efficient and cleaner automobiles. There will be rising   demand for smaller, more energy efficient homes likey in milder climates, as   well as demand for efficient appliances and heating and cooling   systems.  Across the board, businesses will be forced to be more energy   efficient. Scores of new companies will seek to profit from new   opportunities in what could easily end up overshadowing the telecom/Internet   Bubble. Yesterday in an article   by Bloomberg’s Edward Robinson: “SolFocus sounds like a typical Silicon   Valley startup: Eight employees, big ideas -- and zero profit. Yet in   mid-May, the phones at the eight-month-old company wouldn’t stop   ringing. The callers were venture capitalists, and they were dangling   millions of dollars in front of the Palo Alto, California-based solar panel   maker. Ty Jagerson, vice president of business development, says as soon as   he’d start talking to one VC, another would call offering money. ‘It was   completely insane,’ Jagerson, 35, says. Up and down Sand Hill Road, the   venture capital hub south of San Francisco, the financiers who bankrolled the   technology boom of the 1990s are chasing their next big thing: alternative   forms of energy… VCs haven’t buzzed like this since the Internet captured   investors’ imaginations in the 1990s.” “Ernest Moniz,   co-chairman of the Energy Research Council at Massachusetts Institute of   Technology, which is researching noncarbon-based energy sources, says the   world must come to grips with its appetite for energy and the environmental   havoc being wrought by fossil fuels. There’s no time to waste, he   says. ‘These are huge issues that have to be grappled with. We’re   talking about a transformation of the global energy infrastructure over the   next few decades.’” If this view proves   correct – “a transformation of the global energy infrastructure over the next   few decades” – it will prove one very tall order for global economies and   Credit systems, especially ours, due to the U.S.’s insatiable appetite for   more energy than we can produce as well as the reality that our overheated   Credit system is already severely bloated with mortgage debt. For now,   it is safe to assume that the current investment boom in ethanol, biodiesel,   solar, geothermal, solar, nanotechnologies, oil and gas exploration, and   myriad other energy, environmental and conservation technologies create an   almost endless source of demand for financial, human and natural   resources. And, importantly, for now the Credit system is able and   willing to finance this boom.  Yes, vulnerable Credit   systems could falter and the potential for systemic debt dislocation should   never be ruled out. But to dismiss what today appears the likely   probability of an ongoing massive energy/climate-related borrowing and   spending binge is unwise. As a witness to the resurgent Texas housing   market and economy, I am willing to suggest that the energy boom is already   underpinning income growth that is underpinning inflated housing   markets. Clearly, there is a powerful inflationary bias that permeates   the expansive energy and energy-related technology arenas that is poised to   strengthen as long as finance is forthcoming. When I contemplate the   future, I see a U.S. economy that will have no option other than massive   restructuring. As an economy, it appears today that we will have little   alternative than to consume significantly less oil, produce much more of   various types of energy domestically, use energy much more efficiently and   cleanly, consume fewer imports, and produce more manufactured goods for   domestic consumption and export. This will entail a radical shift away   from the service sector to the more arduous (and surely less “productive”)   task of producing real things. Again, this is all a very tall order,   even without devastating natural and man-made disasters.  Such a massive economic   endeavor would require enormous resources – natural, technological, human and   financial. Until I see something to alter my view, I would expect such a   huge undertaking to entail great dislocation and pack quite an inflationary   punch. This radical change in the nature of spending and investment will   ensure that wide swaths of our current economy become uneconomic (and   depressing for many). At the same time, the new patterns of the flow of   finance will strain limited resources and greatly disturb prevailing pricing   dynamics. There will be no alternative to massive government deficits at   all levels, and I would expect the federal government will have no viable   option other than to guarantee significant amounts of private sector debt   (similar to what Fannie and Freddie have done in household   mortgages). In such a scenario, we should expect the Federal Reserve and   Congress to take extraordinary measure to underpin the Credit market on the   grounds of national security, openly stated or otherwise. And if energy and other   resources do become in such short supply globally, long-term inflation   forecasts must also consider the likelihood of more and larger military   confrontations. These would be inflationary, just as the “war on terror”   and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are today.  I have read the   argument that Credit Bubbles always end in deflation. This is factually   inaccurate, and we can look to Argentina and Indonesia as recent examples of   bursting Bubbles and the inflationary havoc wrought by collapsing   currencies. Any thoughtful prognostication with respect to the future   course of inflation must incorporate a view of the dollar’s prospects, as   well as global currencies generally. Currency values are always relative,   and we’ve already witnessed over the past two years how inflating (devaluing)   foreign currencies can stabilize the nominal value of the dollar. We’ve   also seen how concerted currency debasement can have a striking impact on oil   and commodity prices.  With a structurally   maladjusted, energy glutton, and import-dependent “services” economy, along   with an overheated Credit system and massive prospective government deficits,   one can easily envision the dollar as a structurally weak currency for years   to come. And I certainly expect China and Asia to face similar   inflationary pressures, ensuring an inflationary bias for imported energy and   goods prices for some time.   The least unfavorable   course today would be to impose a meaningful slowdown on the highly   imbalanced and overheated U.S. economy, setting the stage for a major   redeployment of resources. Ironically, a U.S. recession is today seen as   absolutely unacceptable, with policymakers (including our new Treasury   Secretary) espousing the notion that the U.S. and our trading partners can   grow our way out of imbalances. We need Washington to step back - do a   Reality Check - and come to the recognition that the current global financial   and economic boom is very much the problem and not the solution. I won’t   hold my breath. I also won’t be lining up to buy U.S. bonds anytime   soon.  |