Saturday, November 1, 2014

08/19/2011 The PhD Standard *

For the week, the S&P500 sank 4.7% (down 10.7% y-t-d), and the Dow fell 4.0% (down 6.6%). The Morgan Stanley Cyclicals were hit for 10.1% (down 24%), and the Transports fell 8.7% (down 17.3%). The Morgan Stanley Consumer index declined 2.1% (down 10.3%), while the Utilities rallied 1.8% (up 2.3%). The Banks dropped another 5.9% (down 32.0%), while the Broker/Dealers sank 6.3% (down 30.8%). The S&P 400 Mid-Caps dropped 6.6% (down 13.2%), and the small cap Russell 2000 fell 6.6% (down 16.8%). The Nasdaq100 lost 6.6% (down 8.1%), and the Morgan Stanley High Tech index sank 8.1% (down 19.6%). The Semiconductors were hammered for 8.2% (down 20.8%). The InteractiveWeek Internet index sank 9.5% (down 17.1%). The Biotechs declined 2.4% (down 15%). With bullion surging $103, the lagging HUI gold index gained 3.0% (up 1.4%).

One and two-month Treasury bill rates ended the week at zero, nothing, nada. Two-year government yields were little changed at 0.19%. Five-year T-note yields ended the week down 7 bps to 0.99%. Ten-year yields dropped 19 bps to 2.07%. Long bond yields sank 33 bps to 3.40%. Benchmark Fannie MBS yields fell 11 bps to 3.19%. The spread between 10-year Treasury yields and benchmark MBS yields widened 8 to 112 bps. Agency 10-yr debt spreads widened 8 to 9 bps. The implied yield on December 2012 eurodollar futures rose 5 bps to 0.485%. The 10-year dollar swap spread declined 3 to 13.75 bps. The 30-year swap spread increased 3 bps to negative 35 bps. Corporate bond spreads widened further. An index of investment grade bond risk jumped 7 bps to 123 bps. An index of junk bond risk surged 49 bps to 701 bps.

Investment-grade issuers included AT&T $5.0bn, Occidental Petroleum $2.125bn, Walt Disney $1.85bn, Dentsply $1.0bn, Kinross Gold $1.0bn, Burlington Northern $750 million, VF Corp $900 million, Neighbors Industries $700 million, Magellan Midstream $550 million, Southern Co. $500 million, Coca Cola Enterprises $500 million, Progressive Corp $500 million, Northern Trust $500 million, PPL Electric Securities $400 million, Western Union $400 million, San Diego G&E $350 million, Florida Power $300 million, Oglethorpe Power $300 million, Flir Systems $250 million, and Boston University $100 million.

Junk bond funds saw outflows of $408bn (from Lipper). Junk debt issuers included AVD $400 million.

I saw no convertible debt issued.

International dollar bond issuers included Canadian Housing Trust $5.0bn, Quebec $1.4bn, and Transporte Energia $100 million.

German bund yields sank 23 bps to 2.10% (down 86bps y-t-d), and U.K. 10-year gilt yields fell 15 bps this week to 2.39% (down 112bps). Greek two-year yields ended the week up 344 bps to 36.50% (up 2,426bps). Greek 10-year note yields jumped 96 bps to 16.16% (up 374bps). Italian 10-yr yields declined 8 bps to 4.92% (up 11bps) and Spain's 10-year yields dipped 3 bps to 4.94% (down 50bps). Ten-year Portuguese yields rose 22 bps to 10.32% (up 374bps). Irish yields declined 36 bps to 9.26% (up 20bps). The German DAX equities index sank 8.6% (down 20.7% y-t-d). Japanese 10-year "JGB" yields dropped 6 bps to 0.98% (down 14bps). Japan's Nikkei declined 2.7% (down 14.8%). Emerging markets were under pressure. For the week, Brazil's Bovespa equities index declined 1.9% (down 24.3%), and Mexico's Bolsa slipped 0.7% (down 14%). South Korea's Kospi index declined 2.8% (down 14.9%). India’s equities index sank 4.3% (down 21.3%). China’s Shanghai Exchange fell 2.3% (down 9.7%). Brazil’s benchmark dollar bond yields sank 19 bps to 3.55%, and Mexico's benchmark bond yields dropped 27 bps to 3.41%.

Freddie Mac 30-year fixed mortgage rates sank 17 bps to 4.15% (down 27bps y-o-y). Fifteen-year fixed rates dropped 14 bps to 3.36% (down 54bps y-o-y). One-year ARMs declined 3 bps to 2.86% (down 57bps y-o-y). Bankrate's survey of jumbo mortgage borrowing costs had 30-yr fixed jumbo rates down 4 bps to 4.91% (down 44bps y-o-y).

Federal Reserve Credit declined $6.5bn to $2.848 TN. Fed Credit was up $440bn y-t-d and $546bn from a year ago, or 23.7%. Elsewhere, Fed Foreign Holdings of Treasury, Agency Debt this past week (ended 8/17) increased $8.6bn to a record $3.479 TN. "Custody holdings" were up $128bn y-t-d and $303bn from a year ago, or 9.5%.

Global central bank "international reserve assets" (excluding gold) - as tallied by Bloomberg – were up $1.589 TN y-o-y, or 18.6% to a record $10.136 TN. Over two years, reserves were $3.047 TN higher, for 43% growth.

M2 (narrow) "money" supply jumped another $43bn to a record $9.517 TN. "Narrow money" has expanded at a 12.6% pace y-t-d and 10.2% over the past year. For the week, Currency increased $1.4bn. Demand and Checkable Deposits declined $3.9bn, while Savings Deposits surged $40.9bn. Small Denominated Deposits declined $3.7bn. Retail Money Funds increased $8.4bn.

Total Money Fund assets rose $10.2bn last week to $2.631 TN. Money Fund assets were down $179bn y-t-d, with a decline of $198bn over the past year, or 7.0%.

Total Commercial Paper outstanding dropped $22.6bn to a 15-week low $1.147 Trillion. CP was up $175bn y-t-d, or 23.6% annualized, with a one-year rise of $36bn.

Global Credit Market Watch:

August 17 – Bloomberg (James G. Neuger and Simon Kennedy): “The latest Franco-German strategy to counter the euro debt crisis stressed ideas already in the works, shunning bolder steps investors were seeking to calm markets. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy ruled out steps such as the issuance of euro bonds or expanding the bailout fund. They backed a plan being drawn up for national balanced-budget amendments and reheated one rejected last year for a financial-transactions tax. They called for the 17 euro leaders to hold two summits a year, the same number of times they have already met in 2011.”

August 15 – Bloomberg (Jana Randow): “The European Central Bank jeopardizes its independence by buying government bonds of distressed euro-region countries, Otmar Issing, former chief economist, said… ‘It cannot be the task of a central bank. If it enters political territory, it risks its independence,’ Issing said… Issuing euro bonds would be a ‘catastrophe’ that might result in higher taxes and spending cuts, he said.”

August 15 – Bloomberg (Patrick Donahue): “The general secretary of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union, Hermann Groehe, rejected the opposition Social Democrats’ call for joint European bonds, saying the plan would cause interest rates to soar and could endanger the single currency…”

August 16 – Bloomberg (Sonia Sirletti and Esteban Duarte): “Italian retail investors are spoiled for choice as the country’s banks prepare to refinance a third of their debt at a time when the government is offering yields at euro-era records on its securities. The country’s lenders, including UniCredit SpA and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA, have more than 100 billion euros ($145 billion) of bonds to repay by the end of 2012. The government, which has paid more for its money than financial firms for the past four months, will sell quadruple that amount in the same period. ‘The maturities of the Italian public debt create a sort of competition with the issues of the banking sector,’ Paola Sabbione, an analyst at Deutsche Bank AG, wrote…”

August 15 – Bloomberg (Donal Griffin and Christine Harper): “Citigroup Inc. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. increased gross exposures to French banks in the year’s first half before the European nation’s financial stocks plunged amid perceived dependence on short-term funding. Citigroup… boosted gross ‘cross-border outstandings’ with French banks 40% to $15.7 billion from Jan. 1 through June 30… Goldman Sachs increased claims by 31% to $38.5 billion in the first half…”

August 15 – Bloomberg (Christine Idzelis): “The cost to finance leveraged buyouts in the U.S. is the highest since December as Europe’s debt crisis and a weakening economy damps demand for high-yield, high-risk loans. Average monthly interest rates on institutional leveraged- loans, or the debt used to finance LBOs, rose to 491 bps more than benchmarks in July… Margins increased from a February low of 378 bps.”

August 17 – Financial Times (Telis Demos): “Investors’ shift out of higher-risk corporate credits is hitting the convertible bond market, which is on track for its worst monthly performance since the height of the financial crisis. Prices of the hybrid securities, typically issued as bonds that can be converted to equities, have fallen 6.6% so far in August…”

August 19 – Bloomberg (Ben Martin and Hannah Benjamin): “Junk-rated European company bond yields climbed above 10% for the first time in a year as investors demand more compensation for the region’s stalling economic growth.”

August 18 – Bloomberg (Tasneem Brogger and Frances Schwartzkopff): “Denmark’s regional banks are cutting lending and selling off assets to generate cash needed to escape an international funding wall as policy makers grope for measures to boost liquidity. ‘It still looks difficult for banks of our size to get money in the international markets,’ Lasse Nyby, chief executive officer at Spar Nord Bank A/S, Denmark’s fourth-largest listed lender, said… ‘We think it will remain that way for some time.’”

August 18 – Bloomberg (Johan Carlstrom): “Swedish banks must do more to prepare for a deterioration in Europe’s debt crisis that could freeze interbank markets and cut off funding, said Lars Frisell, chief economist at the country’s financial regulator. ‘It won’t take much for the interbank market to collapse,’ Frisell, who is also a member of the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision, said… ‘It’s not that serious at the moment but it feels like it could very easily become that way and that everything will freeze.’”

August 18 – Bloomberg (Denis Maternovsky and Jack Jordan): “Russia failed to borrow as much as it intended to at a sale of ruble-denominated bonds, the third straight auction to fall short this month, as investors concerned by the economic slowdown and world market turmoil demand higher yields.”

Global Bubble Watch:

August 15 – Bloomberg (Jeff Black): “The European Central Bank spent a record amount on government bonds last week as it began buying Italian and Spanish securities to contain the debt crisis. The Frankfurt-based ECB said… it settled purchases worth 22 billion euros ($31.7 billion) in the week…”

August 18 – Bloomberg (Garth Theunissen and Keith Jenkins): “The European Central Bank needs to back up last week’s record purchases of government debt with further buying to prevent speculators from driving borrowing costs for Spain and Italy back up again. ‘The ECB’s bond purchase program has been a very effective deterrent to panic selling, and as long as they don’t blink now, they can have this problem of speculative shorting licked in weeks rather than months,’ said Luca Jellinek… head of European rate strategy at Credit Agricole… The success mirrors the initial benefit of the ECB’s first program of buying Greek bonds in May 2010… ‘They don’t need to do massive amounts every week, but they do need to remain in the market to help stabilize the situation,’ said Olaf Penninga, who helps manage 140 billion euros at Robeco Group… ‘They could probably get away with a few billion a week if asset markets remain relatively stable, but they would have to do considerably more if political tensions arise, like internal disagreement within the ECB or opposition to the buying from Germany.’”

Currency Watch:

August 19 – Bloomberg (Allison Bennett): “The yen rallied to the strongest level since World War II versus the dollar as the U.S. economic slowdown and Europe’s debt crisis stoked concern global growth is slumping bolstered the refuge appeal of Japan’s currency.”

The U.S. dollar index slipped 0.8% this week at 74.00 (down 6.4% y-t-d). For the week on the upside, the Swedish krona increased 1.9%, the British pound 1.2%, the Norwegian krone 1.1%, the Danish krone 1.1%, the euro 1.1%, the Brazilian real 0.8%, the Australian dollar 0.5%, the Japanese yen 0.2%, the Singapore dollar 0.2%, and the Mexican peso 0.1%. On the downside, the New Zealand dollar declined 1.7%, the Swiss franc 0.9%, the South Korean won 0.7%, the Canadian dollar 0.3%, the South African rand 0.1%, and the Taiwanese dollar 0.1%.

Commodities and Food Watch:

August 17 – Bloomberg (Steve Stroth): “Agricultural losses from a drought in Texas have reached a record $5.2 billion and may worsen without more rain, Texas AgriLife Extension Service, a unit of Texas A&M University, said… Losses exceed the previous record of $4.1 billion during a drought in 2006…”

August 18 – Bloomberg (Daniel Cancel and Nathan Crooks): “Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez ordered the central bank to repatriate $11 billion of gold reserves held in developed nations’ institutions such as the Bank of England as prices for the metal rise to a record. Venezuela, which holds 211 tons of its 365 tons of gold reserves in U.S., European, Canadian and Swiss banks, will progressively return the bars to its central bank’s vault, Chavez said…”

Commodities were notably resilient. The CRB index gained 0.9% this week (down 1.0% y-t-d). The Goldman Sachs Commodities Index slipped 0.3% (up 1.5%). Spot Gold surged 5.9% to $1,850 (up 30%). Silver jumped 9.7% to $42.93 (up 39%). September Crude fell $2.81 to $82.57 (down 10%). September Gasoline added 1.4% (up 17%), while September Natural Gas declined 3.1% (down 11%). December Copper declined 0.9% (down 10%). September Wheat jumped 4.0% (down 8%), and September Corn added 1.3% (up 13%).

China Bubble Watch:

August 16 – Bloomberg (David Yong and Andrea Wong): “Chinese corporate borrowing costs are rising at the fastest pace this year, reaching a record compared with interest rates on government debt, as bank lending curbs drive companies to the bond market and the economy cools.”

August 16 – Bloomberg: “China cracked down on illegal ‘hot money’ cases worth a combined value of more than $16 billion, a 27% rise from a year ago, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange said…”

August 16 – Bloomberg: “Frank He said he faked a divorce from his wife of 10 years to skirt China’s ban on third mortgages and obtain a bank loan for a third property, a 12 million yuan ($1.9 million) suburban villa. ‘My wife and I love each other, but as long as we can get the mortgage from the bank for the deal, we’ll take it,’ said He, a 40-year-old manager at a chemical company. The forged document, which cost the Shanghai couple 20,000 yuan, helped them get a loan amounting to 60% of the purchase price… Chinese homebuyers and developers are finding loopholes as they come under pressure from government policies to curb gains in residential prices…”

Japan Watch:

August 15 – Bloomberg (Go Onomitsu and Stuart Biggs): “Agura Bokujo, operator of a cattle ranch north of Tokyo, became Japan’s biggest corporate failure this year after consumer fears over beef contaminated with radiation damaged sales, Tokyo Shoko Research said. The closely held company in Tochigi prefecture had 433.1 billion yen ($5.6 billion) in liabilities…”

Asia Bubble Watch:

August 18 – Bloomberg (Shamim Adam and Gan Yen Kuan): “Malaysia’s economy grew at the slowest pace since 2009 last quarter… Gross domestic product rose 4% in the three months through June from a year earlier, after expanding a revised 4.9%...”

India Watch:

August 18 – Bloomberg (Madelene Pearson): “Investors in India are dumping bonds and pumping record amounts of money into gold as they seek refuge from inflation and the financial-market turmoil that was spurred by developed nations’ debt crises.”

August 19 – Bloomberg (Luzi Ann Javier): “India, the biggest sugar user, may produce less than it consumes as early as October 2012, possibly spurring the first net imports in three years, said ITC Ltd. That would push up global prices, said Standard Chartered Plc. ‘India is likely to become a structural importer’ like China, said Somnath Chatterjee, ITC’s head of procurement…”

Latin America Watch:

August 17 – Bloomberg (Matthew Bristow and Andre Soliani): “Brazil’s economy shrank in June for the first time since the global financial crisis of 2008, causing traders to increase bets that the central bank will cut interest rates this year.”

Unbalanced Global Economy Watch:

August 16 – Bloomberg (Jana Randow): “The German economy, Europe’s largest, almost stalled in the second quarter as the region’s sovereign-debt crisis weighed on confidence. Gross domestic product… rose 0.1% from the first quarter, when it jumped a revised 1.3%... The worse-than-expected GDP data from Germany, which had been powering euro-area growth, add to signs Europe is flirting with a renewed economic slump as the debt crisis curbs spending across the region. France’s recovery unexpectedly ground to a halt in the second quarter, Italian and Spanish expansion remained sluggish and Greece’s economy contracted.”

August 16 – Bloomberg (Simone Meier): “European economic growth slowed more than economists forecast in the second quarter as Germany’s recovery almost ground to a halt amid the worsening sovereign- debt crisis. Gross domestic product in the 17-nation euro area rose 0.2% from the first quarter, when it increased 0.8%...”

August 16 – Bloomberg (Diana ben-Aaron and Kati Pohjanpalo): “Finland’s economic growth slowed in June… as policy makers in the northernmost euro member tackle sluggish export markets amid weakening global recovery prospects. Gross domestic product expanded an annual 2.5% in June, down from a revised 4.8% in May…”

August 16 – Bloomberg (Greg Quinn): “Canadian factory sales declined for a third month in June, the longest drop since the last recession, led by petroleum and jewelry. Sales fell 1.5% on a seasonally adjusted basis…”

August 17 – Bloomberg (Svenja O’Donnell): “U.K. unemployment claims increased the most in more than two years in July, adding pressure on Prime Minister David Cameron as the economic outlook worsens.”

August 17 – Bloomberg (Richard Vines): “The cost of dinner for two in London has surged 11% over the past year -- the biggest gain in more than two decades -- and now exceeds 90 pounds ($148) for the first time, the publishers of a restaurant guide said…”

U.S. Bubble Economy Watch:

August 19 – Bloomberg (Shobhana Chandra, Alex Kowalski and David J. Lynch): “Signs that consumer prices are rising even as the U.S. economy slows may delay additional moves by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke to spur growth. The Fed chairman, who is scheduled to speak at a Jackson Hole, Wyoming, conference on Aug. 26, used the annual gathering of economists last year to hint at a second round of so-called quantitative easing…”

August 17 – Bloomberg (Alex Kowalski): “Wholesale costs in the U.S. rose more than forecast in July, led by higher prices for tobacco, trucks and pharmaceuticals, showing declines in commodity expenses have yet to filter to other goods… Compared with July 2010, companies paid 7.2% more for goods last month…”

August 15 – Bloomberg (Elizabeth Campbell): “U.S. meat consumers are swapping premium steaks for cheaper ground beef as concern for high unemployment and slower economic growth forces families to trim their food budgets, according to industry researcher CattleFax. …retail ground-beef prices… climbed 17% this year and averaged $2.774 a pound in June, the highest since at least 1984.”

Central Banking Watch:

August 17 – Reuters: “European Central Bank policymaker Juergen Stark, turning to monetary policy... warned against too-low interest rates. Noting that the Frankfurt-based central bank had never cut its main interest rate to an extremely low level, he added: ‘Keeping interest rates too low for too long carries risks.’ ‘Such a policy contributes to excessive risk-taking and wrong investments and therefore undermines an economy's growth potential..."

August 17 – Bloomberg (Jeannine Aversa and Tom Keene): “Charles Plosser, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, said the Fed will probably need to raise interest rates before mid-2013 and that policy makers should have waited to see how the economy performed before pledging to hold rates at record lows for two years. ‘It was inappropriate policy at an inappropriate time,’ Plosser… said… ‘We’re reacting too quickly here… A little patience might be a good idea.’”

August 17 – Bloomberg (Steve Matthews): “St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard, who was the first Fed policy maker to urge the round of bond purchases that started last year, said the central bank isn’t signaling a third stimulus program with its commitment to keep rates near zero through mid-2013.”

Fiscal Watch:

August 18 – Bloomberg (Zeke Faux): “The U.S. Justice Department is probing Moody’s… and Standard & Poor’s over ratings of mortgage-backed securities, according to three former employees who said they were interviewed by investigators.”

Real Estate Watch:

August 15 – Bloomberg (Alan Bjerga): “A drought that devastated crops in the southern Great Plains during the second quarter slowed the growth of land values, eroded agricultural income and led to fewer purchases of farm equipment, the Federal Reserve said. While the pace of gains in cropland slowed from the first quarter, properties in a seven-state region that includes Nebraska and Oklahoma were 20% more expensive than a year earlier, the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City said… Ranchland was up 11% from a year earlier, and farm-credit conditions remained positive even as farmers cut back spending, the bank said.”

August 18 – Bloomberg (Simon Packard): “Irish investor Aidan Brooks’s Tribeca Holdings Ltd. paid 13% more than the asking price for a shop on London’s Bond Street that generates slightly more income than a U.K. government bond. It beat three other offers. Buyers like Tribeca made the British capital the world’s top destination for property investment for the past two years as they sought safe bets amid economic, financial and political uncertainty.”

Muni Watch:

August 17 – Bloomberg (Will Daley): “New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said all governmental funds receipts for fiscal year 2011 to 2012 rose $3.3 billion, or 8.4%, over last year through July 2011… All funds receipts were $351.5 million below financial plan first quarterly update projections, which largely evaporates the positive balance seen in tax collections through the first quarter… ‘New York’s recovering economy is struggling to reach cruising altitude,’ Dinapoli said…”
The PhD Standard: 

“There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”  John Maynard Keynes

This week, Federal Reserve “money printing” became a focal point of American political discourse.  Across the Atlantic, a worsening banking crisis failed to diminish German resolve against backing the issuance of “eurobonds.”  Many of us have read and pondered Keynes’s famous quote on debauching the currency so often we’re rather numb to it.  But in light of recent developments, it’s worth reminding readers that history is unequivocal:  The soundness of money – monetary stability – is fundamental to the well-being of both the economy and society.  The myriad consequences of prolonged monetary instability are these days increasingly difficult to disregard.

I have argued that the global financial “system” for decades now has operated in a unique environment.  I know of no comparable period in history where there were no restraints on either the quantity or quality of global Credit creation.  I have further posited that “Unconstrained Credit is the Bane of Capitalism.”  Unfettered finance ensures severe pricing distortions, speculative excess, the misallocation of resources, Bubble dynamics, acute financial and economic fragility - and the “debauching” of currencies across the globe.  Again, increasingly difficult to disregard.

I have referred to this anchorless global Credit system as “Global Wildcat Finance.”  As a proponent for the return to the Gold Standard, Jim Grant has coined the term “The PhD Standard” to describe the current state of monetary affairs.   I hope Mr. Grant doesn’t mind too much if I borrow his brilliant terminology.  It’s just too perfect.  And as a product of public schools and universities (and a couple decades of diligent independent study of finance and economic history), it’s too tempting to label the unfolding tumult the “Ivy League Crisis.”

My hunch is that unfolding developments will likely catch a lot of very intelligent - and highly degreed – folks completely unprepared.  Recent comments from some of this era’s most successful investors suggest they are increasingly out of touch.  The talk today is that stocks are so “cheap,” especially in terms of price-to-earnings multiples.  And on a historical basis, valuations don’t appear expensive.  Yet I would argue that equity multiples should be extraordinarily low today – specifically because system finance is extraordinarily unstable.  And proponents for investing in equities and corporate bonds point to the soundness of corporate America’s balance sheet.  But again, there is much more here than meets the superficial analytical eye.  

Federal debt has increased in the neighborhood of $5.0 TN during the past three years.  This unprecedented expansion of government debt fueled spending and inflated corporate cash flows and earnings.  This followed a decade of similar effects from an unprecedented expansion of household and financial sector borrowings.  In just the past two years, global central bank international reserve holdings expanded over $3.0 TN.  The greatest concerted fiscal and monetary stimulus in history (“The Global Government Finance Bubble”) stoked the reflation of global financial and economic systems.  Now, the global marketplace has meted out harsh punishment to those investors/speculators caught extrapolating the near-term effects of inflationary policymaking – albeit recent growth trajectories, earnings trends or financial asset valuation metrics.  

The debt market experiences of Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Italy point to “systemic extrapolation risks”.  In such an exceptionally unstable Credit environment, most financial assets should trade at discounted valuations.  Future earnings and cash flows are highly uncertain – and extraordinary uncertainties dictate that future cash flows should be discounted back at reasonably high discount rates (definitely not Treasury yields).  There has been an extremely wide divergence between bull and bear valuation metrics, and the markets have begun to move decisively in the “bear’s” direction.  

My thesis remains that the European crisis marks the piercing of the global government debt Bubble.  I fully expect unfolding developments to prove a momentous inflection point in financial and economic history.  The world is today awash in endless debt, financial claims, and financial contracts – and faith in underpinning debt structures is waning.  

At the center of the current storm, the European banking system is increasingly impaired by suspect assets – chiefly the liabilities of hopelessly over-indebted sovereign borrowers.  Forced austerity measures and abruptly tightened finance ensure economic disappointment, as the unavoidable downside of a prolonged Credit cycle gathers momentum.  As major global derivative players and financiers to the “leveraged speculating community” (especially after the demise of much of their American competition in the ’08 crisis), the stability of the major European financial institutions has become a major global market issue.    

The bursting of the Global Government Finance Bubble portends major changes to the derivatives market landscape.  First, some of the major derivatives players are increasingly impaired from holdings of sovereign and related debt instruments.  Second, an important part of my thesis is that government policymaking, in general, will be increasingly incapacitated in the face of a rapidly changing landscape.  The efficacy of fiscal and monetary management is clearly waning, which I believe brings into question key assumptions underpinning much of the derivatives marketplace, including “liquid and continuous markets”.  And as confidence in sovereign debt and policymaking deteriorates – and global markets convulse - the capacity for hundreds of Trillions of derivatives to function as advertised will be questioned.   An issue that should have been addressed in 2008 (better yet, 1998) was allowed (incentivized) to fester.  The PhDs and their quant models are in for another severe test.

European policymaking has become an easy target for market pundits.  “They are timid and lack resolve.”  “Their incompetence and failure to adopt bold action is at the roots of an unnecessary crisis.”  “There is a complete lack of political leadership.”  Essentially, the markets want the Germans to back a new eurobond that could be issued in sufficiently enormous quantities to reflate European markets, economies, banking systems and markets.  The consensus market view holds that such a policy course offers huge benefits with limited costs.  And for markets that have grown accustomed to getting whatever they demand from global policymakers, this is a major shock.  The Germans don’t want to play ball.

No society understands the dangers of debauching the currency better than the Germans.  And they have principled elder statesmen that understand what’s at stake at this critical juncture in financial history.  I wouldn’t count on them backing down.  They appreciate that bailouts and debt guarantees commence a slippery slope of Credit and currency debasement.  Put a German guarantee on the debt required to bailout profligate borrowers and be prepared for years of German-backed debt certain to impair German and European creditworthiness.  The Bundesbank, in particular, must today appreciate that safeguarding their monetary system has become an absolute priority both for the German people and for Europe.  Impairing the stable “core” in the name of assisting a failed periphery would be extremely detrimental to Germany and for European integration.

The long-held German (and Austrian!) notion of “sound money” fails to resonate in The Age of the PhD Standard.  Especially in the U.S., the Great Depression is understood as a consequence of gross dereliction of the Federal Reserve’s responsibility for ensuring sufficient “money” and bank capital.  Somehow it is forgotten that the harbinger of devastating economic collapse was the collapse of confidence in Credit and financial assets.  Instead of a German-like tenacity for protecting the Creditworthiness and stability of the system’s core, our monetary doctors are instead determined to gamble the bedrock of our financial system on a policymaking course that amounts to little more than unending government debt issuance and monetization (contemporary “money printing”).   

Texas governor Perry was lambasted for his verbal attack on “treasonous” Federal Reserve “money printing.”  “Presidential” it was not.  But do I expect this type of message to resonate?  Bet on it!  American society is showing the increasing strains of monetary mismanagement.  More and more, it seems that only the PhDs and stock market punditry actually believe that Fed policymaking is on the right track.  And it really is a fascinating and frightening dynamic where the general populace has this right and policymakers have it dead wrong.  

This is a huge monetary experiment run amuck – and the evidence is everywhere (i.e. high unemployment, rising inflation, massive federal deficits, the Fed’s balance sheet, unstable markets, rising wealth inequality, intractable trade deficits, the value of the dollar, the price of gold, waning American power and influence, public anger and distrust…).  The American people no longer buy the notion that piling on more debt and “money printing” offers a reasonable solution.  They are appreciating that it’s instead the problem, and there will be less tolerance for this “experiment” going forward.

And the PhDs?  They stick steadfastly with their doctrine, not for a minute admitting the experimental and theoretical nature of their policy prescriptions.  And I see no willingness on their part to question their view that contemporary monetary management is enlightened and superior to the past.  There is an element of hubris that gets in the way of objectivity.

I have for years now referred to this theoretical framework – both from an economic doctrine and policymaking perspective – as little more than a sophisticated version of “inflationism.”  And we are increasingly witness to the age-old Scourge of Inflationism.  And as we’ve already witnessed recently, the inflationists will warn about the dangers of not being bold – of losing resolve.  “Don’t repeat the mistakes of Japan!”  As it’s been throughout history, it always seems to be a case of “just one more bout of money printing” and government spending – and then we’ll get monetary religion.  Did I really hear and read this week that the remedy for our nation’s problems is to be found with one more economic stimulus package coupled with additional measures ensuring long-term deficit reduction?   

Fiscal and monetary policies are rapidly losing credibility.  Treasury prices may be inflated, but don’t mistake this for confidence in our system’s “core”.  It may exist completely outside of the PhD’s sophisticated framework, but the markets and regular folk are feeling the ill-effects of currency debauchery.

08/12/2011 Compare and Contrast 2011 vs. 2008 *

For the week, the S&P500 declined 1.7% (down 6.3% y-t-d), and the Dow fell 1.5% (down 2.7%). The S&P 400 Mid-Caps dipped 0.2% (down 7.1%), and the small cap Russell 2000 fell 2.4% (down 11.0%). The Banks sank 8.9% (down 27.8%), and the Broker/Dealers dropped 6.0% (down 26.2%). The Morgan Stanley Cyclicals lost 2.3% (down 15.5%), and the Transports declined 1.5% (down 9.5%). The Morgan Stanley Consumer index declined 1.7% (down 8.4%), and the Utilities gave back 1.2% (up 0.4%). The Nasdaq100 dipped 0.6% (down 1.6%), and the Morgan Stanley High Tech index declined 0.9% (down 12.5%). The Semiconductors rallied 1.5% (down 13.6%). The InteractiveWeek Internet index gained 0.4% (down 8.4%). The Biotechs declined 1.0% (down 13.0%). With bullion surging $83 in a record-setting week, the HUI gold index rallied 7.0% (down 1.6%).

One and two-month Treasury bill rates ended the week at one basis point. Two-year government yields declined 9 bps to 0.19%. Five-year T-note yields ended the week down 29 bps to 0.96%. Ten-year yields sank 31 bps to 2.25%. Long bond yields fell 12 bps to 3.72%. Benchmark Fannie MBS yields declined 35 bps to 3.29%. The spread between 10-year Treasury yields and benchmark MBS yields narrowed 4 to 104 bps. Agency 10-yr debt spreads were little changed at one basis point. The implied yield on December 2012 eurodollar futures sank 22 bps to 0.445%. The 10-year dollar swap spread was little changed at 16 bps. The 30-year swap spread declined 12 bps to negative 39 bps. Corporate bond spreads widened significantly. An index of investment grade bond risk increased 12 bps to 115 bps. An index of junk bond risk jumped 70 bps to 652 bps.

Investment-grade issuers included Thermo Fisher $2.1bn, Procter & Gamble $2.0bn, Berkshire Hathaway $2.0bn, Enterprise Products $1.25bn, Wellpoint $1.1bn, Baker Hughes $750 million, Dominion Resources $450 million, Transcontinental Gas Pipeline $375 million, University of Southern California $300 million, and Public Service Electric & Gas $250 million.

Junk bond funds saw outflows surge to $3.42bn (from Lipper). Junk debt issuers included Cownrock $150 million.

I saw no convertible debt issued.

International dollar bond issuers included Mexico $2.0bn and Network Rail Infrastructure $1.0bn.

German bund yields dipped one basis point to 2.33% (down 63bps y-t-d), and U.K. 10-year gilt yields dropped 16 bps this week to 2.53% (down 98bps). Greek two-year yields ended the week down 46 bps to 32.06% (up 1,982bps). Greek 10-year note yields rose 34 bps to 15.20% (up 274bps). ECB purchases helped Italian 10-yr yields drop 108 bps to 5.00% (up 18bps) and Spain's 10-year yields sink 106 bps to 4.97% (down 47bps). Ten-year Portuguese yields fell 56 bps to 10.11% (up 353bps). Irish yields fell 19 bps to 9.62% (up 56bps). The German DAX equities index sank 3.8% (down 13.3% y-t-d). Japanese 10-year "JGB" yields rose 4 bps to 1.04% (down 8bps). Japan's Nikkei sank 3.6% (down 12.4%). Emerging markets fell under further pressure. For the week, Brazil's Bovespa equities index rallied 1.0% (down 22.8%), while Mexico's Bolsa declined 1.0% (down 13.5%). South Korea's Kospi index sank 7.7% (down 12.6%). India’s equities index fell 2.7% (down 17.9%). China’s Shanghai Exchange declined 1.3% (down 7.7%). Brazil’s benchmark dollar bond yields rose 8 bps to 3.70%, and Mexico's benchmark bond yields jumped 12 bps to 3.65%.

Freddie Mac 30-year fixed mortgage rates fell 7 bps to 4.32% (down 12bps y-o-y). Fifteen-year fixed rates declined 4 bps to 3.50% (down 42bps y-o-y). One-year ARMs sank 13 bps to 2.89% (down 64bps y-o-y). Bankrate's survey of jumbo mortgage borrowing costs had 30-yr fixed jumbo rates down 3 bps to 4.95% (down 47bps y-o-y).

Federal Reserve Credit rose $5.2bn to $2.855 TN. Fed Credit was up $447bn y-t-d and $546bn from a year ago, or 23.6%. Elsewhere, Fed Foreign Holdings of Treasury, Agency Debt this past week (ended 8/10) increased $6.8bn to a record $3.470 TN. "Custody holdings" were up $120bn y-t-d and $306bn from a year ago, or 9.7%.

Global central bank "international reserve assets" (excluding gold) - as tallied by Bloomberg – were up $1.584 TN y-o-y, or 18.5% to a record $10.126 TN. Over two years, reserves were $3.007 TN higher, for 42% growth.

M2 (narrow) "money" supply surged $159bn to a record $9.475 TN. "Narrow money" has expanded at a 12.2% pace y-t-d and 9.6% over the past year. For the week, Currency increased $1.4bn. Demand and Checkable Deposits jumped $99.5bn, and Savings Deposits rose $61.1bn. Small Denominated Deposits declined $3.6bn. Retail Money Funds added $1.1bn.

Total Money Fund assets jumped $52.8bn last week to $2.621 TN. Money Fund assets were down $189bn y-t-d, with a decline of $205bn over the past year, or 7.2%.

Total Commercial Paper outstanding declined $6.4bn to $1.169 Trillion. CP was up $198bn y-t-d, or 28% annualized, with a one-year rise of $64bn.

Global Credit Market Watch:

August 11 – Bloomberg (Will Robinson, Shannon D. Harrington and Mary Childs): “The cost to protect against a default by U.S. banks soared a second day and a benchmark gauge of corporate credit risk reached a 14-month high amid fear that Europe’s debt crisis will infect the global financial system and sink the economy back into recession. Credit-default swaps on Bank of America… surged to the highest since April 2009… A swaps index that gauges the perceived risk of owning junk bonds, which falls as sentiment deteriorates, plunged to the lowest in almost two years.”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Tim Catts and Mary Childs): “Speculative-grade bonds worldwide are inflicting the biggest losses on investors since November 2008 amid the credit-market seizure on mounting evidence that the global economy is in danger of tumbling into recession… Investors withdrew an unprecedented $2.1 billion from junk mutual funds on Aug. 9, research firm EPFR Global said.”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Ben Martin and Hannah Benjamin): “Junk corporate bonds in Europe are losing money this year, erasing their returns in the first half as the region’s deepening debt crisis forced investors to flee all but the safest assets.”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Michael Shanahan): “The cost of protecting European corporate bonds from default surged to the highest since April 2009…”

August 9 – Bloomberg (Jack Jordan and Maria Levitov): “Surging borrowing costs threaten to disrupt Russia’s sale of 10-year bonds for the second time in a month amid the rout in global equities. Plunging bond prices lifted yields on ruble-denominated debt due in 2021 by 30 bsp…”

August 9 – Bloomberg (Gabrielle Coppola and Boris Korby): “Banco Cruzeiro do Sul SA and Banco Industrial e Comercial SA are posting the biggest losses among Brazilian bonds, part of a rout in midsize bank debt, on concern the global sell-off will cause credit markets to seize up.”

August 8 – Bloomberg (Lorenzo Totaro): “Italian bank borrowing from the European Central Bank nearly doubled last month as yields on the country’s bonds surged amid the region’s debt crisis. Italian banks’ borrowing from the ECB rose 39.2 billion euros ($55.9 billion) to 80.49 billion euros from June…”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Boris Korby): “Investors are demanding the biggest premium to own Brazilian corporate dollar bonds instead of government securities in more than two years, signaling a drought in overseas debt sales may deepen.”

Global Bubble Watch:

August 12 – Bloomberg: “China’s central bank said that the U.S. faces ‘debt sustainability’ risks in the medium- and long-term, the latest expression of concern from the nation that is America’s biggest creditor. ‘Developed countries’ debt problems are worrisome’ and may restrain a longer-term global recovery, the People’s Bank of China said in a quarterly monetary policy report… In addition, the euro zone’s debt woes may spread to ‘key nations,’ it said.”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Jana Randow, Jeannine Aversa and Scott Lanman): “Central bankers are racing to shield their economies from fiscal tightening and lopsided currency swings that threaten a new global recession. In the 72 hours after a Group of Seven conference call on Aug. 7, the Federal Reserve pledged to keep interest rates near zero through at least mid-2013, the European Central Bank intervened in bond markets and the Bank of England indicated it’s ready to add more stimulus if needed. Japan signaled renewed concern about the yen and Switzerland yesterday stepped up its fight to curb an ‘overvalued’ franc. ‘Central bankers have so far been the tower of strength,’ said Stefan Schneider, chief international economist at Deutsche Bank… ‘Lawmakers have done everything to destroy belief in their ability to solve the problems they’re facing.’”

August 10 – Bloomberg (Susanne Walker and Betty Liu): “The Federal Reserve faces a ‘hard discussion’ in response to a slowing U.S. economy before the Kansas City Fed’s conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, according to Mohamed El-Erian… ‘People have gone from asking is the Fed going to do something to will the Fed be effective in doing something,’ El- Erian said…”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Arnaldo Galvao): “South American finance officials are considering creating a $10 billion to $20 billion emergency fund to assist nations that experience capital flight should the global economic crisis deepen, two government officials involved in the talks said.”

August 9 – Bloomberg (Seonjin Cha): “South Korea’s regulator will ban short sales of stocks for three months after the nation’s benchmark equity index had its biggest six-day drop in three years amid concerns that European and U.S. debt problems will lead to a global recession.”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Michael Patterson and Benjamin Harvey): “Turkey moved to curb short sales and threatened ‘severe penalties’ for stock manipulation, joining nations from Greece to South Korea in trying to stem bearish bets after the worst tumble in global shares since 2008.”

Currency Watch:

August 11 – Bloomberg (Klaus Wille and Paul Verschuur): “The franc weakened after Swiss Central Bank Vice President Thomas Jordan said a temporary franc peg is within the range of options that policy makers could use to stem the currency’s record-breaking rally. ‘Any temporary measures to influence the exchange rate are permissible under our mandate as long as these are consistent with long-term price stability,’ Jordan said…”

The U.S. dollar index was little changed this week at 74.61 (down 5.6% y-t-d). For the week on the upside, the Japanese yen increased 2.2% and the Singapore dollar 0.4%. On the downside, the South African rand declined 3.6%, the Mexican peso 2.6%, the Brazilian real 2.2%, the Swiss franc 1.4%, the South Korean won 1.1%, the Norwegian krone 0.9%, the Australian dollar 0.8%, the British pound 0.7%, the Canadian dollar 0.5%, the Swedish krona 0.5%, the Danish krone 0.3%, the Danish krone 0.3%, the Euro 0.2% and the Taiwanese dollar 0.2%.

Commodities and Food Watch:

August 9 – Bloomberg (Justin Doom and Debarati Roy): “The worst Texas drought in more than a century has left cotton-crop conditions that rival the Dust Bowl of the early 1930s, forcing farmers to abandon more fields than ever before. Most growers will at least break even this year from insurance claims, with the reimbursement rate on policies higher than the price of New York cotton futures, according to a Bloomberg News survey… ‘The number and severity of claims in the Texas Panhandle, High Plains, rolling plains and backlands will be substantially higher than recent years,’ said Ted Etheredge, president of Lubbock, Texas-based Armtech Insurance, the fifth-largest U.S. writer of federally sponsored crop-insurance policies. ‘The drought is severe, so non-irrigated acreage in most areas had emergence issues, and now irrigated crops are suffering.’”

August 9 – Bloomberg (Lucia Kassai): “Brazil’s coffee crops were ‘severely’ damaged by frost in June and August in some areas, Cooperativa Regional de Cafeicultores em Guaxupe Ltda, Brazil’s largest coffee cooperative, said. About 4,400 hectares (10,872 acres) of crops had freezing temperatures, of which 70% had ‘light to moderate’ damage and 30% were ‘severely’ damaged…”

The CRB index was little changed this week (down 1.9% y-t-d). The Goldman Sachs Commodities Index slipped 0.4% (up 1.8%). Spot Gold surged 5.0% to $1,747 (up 23%). Silver rose 2.4% to $39.12 (up 27%). September Crude declined $1.45 to $85.43 (down 7%). September Gasoline added 0.6% (up 15%), and September Natural Gas gained 3.1% (down 8%). December Copper fell 2.9% (down 9%). September Wheat rallied 3.5% (down 12%), and September Corn added 1.3%(up 12%).

China Bubble Watch:

August 9 – Bloomberg: “China’s inflation accelerated to the fastest pace in three years in July, limiting the scope for monetary easing to support growth as plunging stock markets signal the global recovery is weakening. Consumer prices climbed 6.5% from a year earlier as food costs surged…”

August 12 – Bloomberg: “China’s new lending sank to the least this year in July and money supply expanded at a slower pace, adding to signs the fastest-growing major economy is cooling as the global recovery falters. Lending of 492.6 billion yuan ($77 billion) was less than the 550 billion yuan median estimate… M2… rose 14.7% after a 15.9% gain in June.”

August 12 – Bloomberg: “Chinese regulators have told banks to tighten lending for real estate on concern credit risks will increase as the impact of government curbs deepens in the next three to five months, a person familiar with the matter said.”

August 12 – Bloomberg: “Wenzhou-based Topsun Group makes diesel generators and runs hotels in China. Chairman Wang Chonghuan is a typical entrepreneur -- hard-working, hands-on, ready to pounce on any opportunity, accustomed to bouncing back from difficulties. Yet he doesn’t sound very optimistic when he talks about the credit situation that China’s small business sector faces today. ‘I have been doing business for 30 years, and I have never seen such high interest rates,’ says Wang. ‘Borrowing any money almost amounts to committing suicide.’”

India Watch:

August 11 – Bloomberg (Tushar Dhara): “India’s food inflation accelerated to a three-month high and exports grew at the fastest pace in at least 16 years, maintaining pressure on the central bank to raise interest rates amid the risk of a global downturn. An index measuring wholesale prices of farm products rose 9.9%... from a year earlier…”

Latin America Watch:

August 9 – Bloomberg (Francisco Marcelino): “Banco do Brasil SA, Latin America’s largest bank by assets, cut its forecast for loan growth after Brazil’s government took measures to curb credit expansion. The lender posted a 22% increase in second-quarter profit. The… lender’s loan portfolio is likely to expand 15% to 18% this year, down from an earlier forecast of 17% to 20%... Banco do Brasil said its domestic loan portfolio climbed 17% to 358.6 billion reais ($220.5bn) in the second quarter.”

Unbalanced Global Economy Watch:

August 9 – Bloomberg (Theophilos Argitis): “Canadian housing starts climbed in July at the fastest pace in 15 months, adding to evidence the country’s real estate market remains buoyant amid low borrowing costs.”

August 12 – Bloomberg (Maria Petrakis): “Greece’s economy continued to contract in the second quarter, offering a cautionary tale for policy makers struggling to solve Europe’s debt crisis. Gross domestic product fell 6.9% from a year earlier, after declining 8.1% on an annual basis in the first quarter…”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Scott Rose and Alena Chechel): “Russia’s economy slowed for a second quarter and missed economist estimates as industrial growth eased and inflation eroded consumer buying power… Gross domestic product expanded 3.4%...”

U.S. Bubble Economy Watch:

August 12 – Bloomberg (Angela Greiling Keane): “The U.S. Postal Service, which predicts a loss this year of as much as $9 billion, may seek to break union contracts so it can slash 220,000 jobs by 2015 and withdraw from federal health-benefit and retirement programs, according to draft proposals.”

Central Banking Watch:

August 10 – Bloomberg (Craig Torres and Joshua Zumbrun): “Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s plan to hold interest rates near zero through at least mid-2013 provoked the most opposition among voting policy makers in 18 years as central bank consensus frayed. The Fed chief achieved unanimous support on the Federal Open Market Committee in 2008 when he lowered interest rates to near zero, and in 2009 when he launched $1.73 trillion in bond purchases. Last year, his plan to buy another $600 billion in assets drew one dissent. Yesterday, three policy makers dissented from the decision to apply a specific date to the Fed’s low rate pledge for the first time.”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Vivien Lou Chen): “Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Narayana Kocherlakota identified limits to Fed policy in a speech last year that suggested he might be willing to break ranks with his colleagues. On Aug. 9, he made his move. The 47-year-old economist said in a September speech that 2.5 percentage points or more of the U.S. jobless rate is due to mismatches between workers and businesses, including location, which the Fed lacks the tools to fix. ‘Central bankers alone cannot solve the world’s economic problems, Kocherlakota said.”

August 9 – Bloomberg (Jeff Black and Jana Randow): “When Jean-Claude Trichet retires on Oct. 31, the euro area may lose more than just a European Central Bank president. Trichet has emerged as Europe’s key policy maker during the sovereign debt crisis, holding the 12-year-old monetary union together as heads of state squabble over their response. While ECB officials have sometimes split over the direction, under Trichet the central bank shown itself more willing and able to act than the bloc’s 17 finance ministers and government leaders. ‘Trichet has become the de facto president of Europe,’ said Marco Valli, chief European economist at UniCredit Global Research… ‘He is the only one who’s delivered the leadership necessary during this crisis.’”

August 8 – Bloomberg (Rich Miller): “Central bankers from the U.S. to China may have to decide which is their worst nightmare: the Great Inflation of the 1970s or Great Depression of the 1930s. As stock markets slump worldwide and the global economy sputters, monetary-policy makers are struggling to come up with new strategies to spur growth. The catch is that they risk adding to price pressures if they pump more money into the financial system as inflation climbs. It’s what ‘are you most scared of’ -- the risk of spiraling prices or a plunging economy, said Vincent Reinhart, who was the Federal Reserve’s chief monetary-policy strategist from 2001 until 2007 and is now a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington.”

August 12 – Bloomberg (Vivien Lou Chen): “Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Narayana Kocherlakota said he sees no need for further monetary accommodation, releasing a statement to explain his dissenting vote at the Fed’s Aug. 9 meeting. ‘I do not believe that providing more accommodation -- easing monetary policy -- is the appropriate response to these changes in the economy,’ he said today, referring to falling unemployment since November and rising inflation as measured by the Fed’s preferred price gauge.”

Fiscal Watch:

August 11 – Bloomberg (Heidi Przybyla and Kristin Jensen): “The lineup of Democrats and Republicans named to a new congressional panel charged with finding $1.5 trillion in budget savings is raising doubts about the prospects for a bipartisan compromise to address the national debt before next year’s elections. U.S. House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell yesterday announced their appointments to the 12-member committee created in the Aug. 2 law that raised the nation’s debt limit and averted a default.”

Real Estate Watch:

August 11 – New York Times (Kirk Semple): “Chinese banks have poured more than $1 billion into real estate loans in New York City in the past year. Investors from China are snapping up luxury apartments and planning to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on commercial and residential projects like Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn. Chinese companies have signed major leases at the Empire State Building and at 1 World Trade Center, which is the centerpiece of the rebuilding at ground zero… The Chinese investments are occurring with little fanfare, in part because Chinese executives tend to shun publicity. But back home, their government is urging them to invest overseas to diversify China’s foreign-exchange holdings, develop business partnerships and improve the country’s leverage in international affairs.”

Muni Watch:

August 9 – Bloomberg (Sarah Frier, Michelle Kaske and William Selway): “More than 11,000 municipal bonds tied to the federal government lost their AAA ratings from Standard & Poor’s, including housing securities and debt backed by leases, after the company downgraded the U.S. S&P assigned AA+ scores to about 11,500 securities in the $2.9 trillion municipal bond market…”

August 9 – Associated Press (Chris Tomlinson): “New data shows state governments have lost $527 billion in revenue since 2007, forcing lawmakers to slash state spending nationwide. According to data released Tuesday, state lawmakers expect slow to moderate economic growth in the next few years and expect to make fewer cuts. But that was before the recent political turmoil over the debt ceiling, a precipitous drop in the stock market and the downgrading of government bonds.”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Carol Wolf): “The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is forcing local governments to spend $100 billion to improve their sewage systems… The EPA is enforcing clean-water regulations in 772 municipalities that it says release too much raw sewage into lakes and rivers during rainstorms and snow melts… The mandates add to the fiscal strains of governments already burdened by falling tax revenue.”

August 12 – Bloomberg (Mark Niquette): “The Illinois fiscal 2012 budget doesn’t address the state’s ‘sizeable backlog of unpaid bills and an unsustainable ascent’ in spending for pension benefits, Moody’s… said… The increase in state corporate and individual income tax- rates that took effect in January will contain growth in total liabilities of almost $120 billion…”

California Watch:

August 9 – Bloomberg (James Nash): “California, the most populous U.S. state, collected $538.8 million, or 10.3%, less revenue in July than projected as higher taxes adopted in 2009 expired. Sales taxes were 12.5%, or $139.4 million, below forecasts, while corporate taxes were down 19.3%, or $69.5 million. Personal-income taxes were 2.9%, or $89 million, higher than projected in May… The July numbers widen the gap between actual receipts and additional revenue on which Governor Jerry Brown and Democrats based their new budget, Chiang said. That $86 billion spending plan signed into law June 30 cut spending by $12 billion and counted on $4 billion in higher-than-forecast tax revenue from a recovering economy.”

August 9 – Associated Press (Adam Weintraub): “Building tracks for the first section of California's proposed high-speed rail line will cost $2.9 billion to $6.8 billion more than originally estimated, raising questions about the affordability of the nation's most ambitious rail project at a time when its planning and finances are under fire. A 2009 business plan developed for the California High-Speed Authority… estimated costs at about $7.1 billion…”

Speculation Watch:

August 12 – Bloomberg (Nina Mehta): “The stock market’s fastest electronic firms boosted trading threefold during the rout that erased $2.2 trillion from U.S. equity values, stepping up strategies that profit from volatility, according to one of their biggest brokers. The increase from Aug. 1 to Aug. 10 over their 2011 average surpassed the 80% rise in U.S. equity volume, showing that high-frequency traders made up more of the market during the plunge, Gary Wedbush, executive vice president and head of capital markets at Wedbush Securities, said… ‘We’re seeing a tremendous amount of high-frequency trading,’ said Wedbush, whose company is one of the biggest execution and clearing brokers catering to high-speed firms.”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Katherine Burton, Saijel Kishan and Kelly Bit): “John Paulson, the billionaire who is betting on an economic recovery by the end of 2012, lost 11% in the first week of August in his largest hedge fund… The decline leaves the Advantage Plus Fund, which tries to profit from corporate events such as takeovers and bankruptcies, down 31% since the start of the year…”

August 9 – Bloomberg (Christine Harper): “Goldman Sachs… the U.S. bank that makes more than half its revenue from trading, lost money in that business on 15 days during the second quarter, the most daily losses since the fourth quarter of 2008.”

August 11 – Bloomberg (Katherine Burton, Saijel Kishan and Zachary R. Mider): “Ken Griffin is in talks to sell his investment bank and is shutting the equity-research group of his securities unit, ending a three-year effort to build a business he said would rival Goldman Sachs…”

Compare & Contrast: 2011 vs. 2008:

I thought a paragraph from today’s Financial Times (“This is Not a 2008 Redux,” Jennifer Hughes) succinctly captured the consensus view:

“At the bottom of all of this is a lurking fear that this is 2008 all over again. But it is not. Since then banks have written down swathes of dud loans and assets, they have built up capital and most immediately important, they have access to central bank liquidity should the market freeze up. Granted, major banks back on life support would, and should, send markets reeling, but the central bank option means investors would not face the cliff-edge event that was Lehman’s collapse.”

With astonishing market volatility, faltering marketplace liquidity, collapsing global bank stocks and the imposition of limited bans on short-selling, the unfolding global financial crisis this week definitely recalled the 2008 experience. As the FT noted, there are important differences. There are, as well, some critical similarities. I thought it was worth delving into a little “Compare and Contrast” – from my analytical perspective.

First of all, the nucleus of the current crisis is in Europe instead of the U.S. financial system. I have for awhile now posited the thesis that policy responses to the 2008 meltdown unleashed a perilous “global government finance Bubble.” The first crack in the latest Bubble developed in the eurozone (Greece), as opposed to the 2008 crisis that emerged at the fringe of U.S. mortgage finance (subprime). Our banks and Wall Street firms were the focal point of 2008 market fears, while it is today the European banking system. It is certainly easier these days for U.S. pundits, analysts and investors to remain complacent – and content to believe that market selling has been way overdone.

Global policy responses to the 2008 turmoil emboldened the view that policymakers retain powerful tools to manage financial crises. A key facet of my bearish thesis is that the bursting of the “government finance Bubble” will find policymaking increasingly ineffective and, in the end, incapacitated. A Bubble fueled by massive fiscal and monetary stimulus nurtures inevitable vulnerability to the waning capacity of these measures to sustain inflated markets and maladjusted economic structures. As we’ve witnessed in the European periphery (and, to a lesser extent, here at home), massive government stimulus reaches a point of diminishing returns. And when a crisis of confidence unfolds in government debt – as has been the case in Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Italy – newfound policymaking constraints quickly become a focal point of market worries.

Yet, a well-entrenched view holds that governments can simply create liquidity and boost bank capital, ensuring no repeat of the “cliff-edge event that was Lehman’s collapse.” Policymakers have supposedly learned from past mistakes. Especially this week, with market attention turning to French and European banks, market debate centers around the capacity for the ECB and European governments to support their fragile banking system.

I’ll again borrow the phrase “a banking system is only as good as its sovereign.” In major contrast to 2008, the issue today is not the vulnerability of heavily leveraged banking systems to a crisis of confidence in private (mainly mortgage) debt and sophisticated “Wall Street” structures. Crisis 2011 is foremost a sovereign debt issue – and this changes things profoundly. Since ‘08, governments have issued Trillions of new debt and, at the same time, have assumed enormous amounts of private-sector risk. Increasingly, governments are losing their capacity to underpin financial systems and economies through additional debt issuance. To keep the latest Bubble from imploding, markets are demanding that those sovereigns that retain the capacity to take on huge additional burdens do so in order to more generally backstop faltering debt structures.

The cost of protecting against a sovereign default by France (in the Credit default swap/CDS market) traded above 180 bps this week, compared to a high of about 65 bps back during 2008 market tumult. Importantly, a crisis that began last year at Europe’s periphery has now afflicted its core. On the one hand, markets expect France and Germany to backstop the faltering eurozone debt structure (sovereign and banking system). On the other, the marketplace is recognizing that the enormity of such an undertaking risks pushing French debt over the proverbial cliff. In contrast to ’08, the pressing issue today is not susceptible firms such as Bear Stearns or Lehman – but (G7) nations such as Italy and France. Already weighed down by holdings of impaired periphery debt, the French banking system is clearly vulnerable to any waning market appetite for French sovereign Credit.

Italian CDS traded above 400 last week, double the 2008 high. Throughout the CDS marketplace, prices (especially the past week) have surged to levels significantly above those from the heart of the 2008 crisis. In the past seven sessions, CDS prices have jumped 36 bps (to 151) in Brazil and 33 bps (to 152 ) in Mexico. In general, the CDS market appears impaired. This week in particular, “emerging” currencies and debt markets turned tumultuous – and worryingly 2008-like, only compounding banking and market worries. Importantly, mechanisms that transmitted instability around the globe back in 2008 are very much intact in 2011.

We’ve all listened to the argument “there’s less leverage in the system now than in 2008.” Well, I’ll assume that much of the egregious speculative excess in high-yielding U.S. mortgage Credit was wrung out of the system (not so confident the same can be said for “AAA” mortgage exposure). Clearly, the U.S. banking system has been much more cautious in their exposures to mortgage and private-sector debt, although there have been ample excesses in corporate “leveraged finance”. I’ll also assume that Wall Street balance sheets are less vulnerable now than in 2008. But when it comes to the global leveraged speculating community, I’m not so convinced that they are any less exposed to tumultuous markets than they were in 2008. And with counter-party risk again an issue, I increasingly fear for the stability of the nebulous entity referred to as “the global derivatives marketplace”.

When the leveraged speculators (hedge funds, proprietary trading desks, etc.) were caught poorly positioned during a faltering U.S. mortgage finance Bubble back in 2008, their problems swiftly became the global financial system’s problem. As they were throughout the 2008 crisis, the leveraged players remain the predominant transmission mechanism from one market to virtually all markets. As losses mount, speculators are forced to reduce risk and leverage throughout the global risk markets. In our highly interlinked global marketplace, liquidity issues and market dislocation in a key market rather quickly evolve into de-risking, de-leveraging and liquidity issues throughout.

Post-2008, a rejuvenated hedge fund community grew to record size (surpassing $2 TN). From my vantage point, their market influence seems as great as ever – at least it appeared so this week. And I’ll venture a guess that leveraged “carry trade” speculations are greater in scope today than was the case in ‘08. An important aspect of “global government finance Bubble” analysis is that the sophisticated players were emboldened – and highly incentivized - by post-’08 government reflationary policymaking. In particular, financial and economic vulnerability ensured extremely low interest rates (and currency devaluation) in the “developed” world, while strong (domestic and global) inflationary biases virtually guaranteed higher returns and strengthening currencies for the “developing” economies/markets. While this trend – along with attendant speculation – was prominent leading up to the 2008 crisis, I fear speculative excesses might have been on an even grander scale over the past two years.

The scope of global “carry trades” (i.e. take the proceeds from shorting/selling a low-yielding currency to speculate in instruments from higher-returning currencies) is a big unknown. How much shorting of dollar instruments (i.e. Treasurys and such) has funded leveraged speculations in the “developing” markets is a question I ponder on a daily basis. We do know that the enormous global “macro” funds have become much bigger and richer since 2008. And, from what I can discern, their returns have seemed to be at least somewhat negatively correlated to the dollar.

Currency markets turned unstable this week. Meanwhile, global risk markets – certainly including the emerging currency, equity and debt markets – became highly correlated. Market action seemed to confirm the view of heightened market vulnerability to the unwind of leveraged “carry trades.” Or, at least, the market became increasingly nervous about the ramifications from weakness in the higher-yielding currencies (quite reminiscent of 2008).

From a high of 1.60 (to the $) in July 2008, the euro sank to 1.25 during the worst of the crisis that October. On a fundamental basis, the euro would appear much more vulnerable today than it was during 2008. And while I would assume that there has been less speculative long buying buoying the euro of late, there has likely been significant hedging activity to protect against a major euro breakdown. This type of hedging activity would tend to increase volatility – which has been the case recently. And it would also increase the risk of an accelerating euro decline – and general currency market instability – in the event the euro begins to break through important levels. This is a big market worry.

From my perspective, the post-2008 landscape has been one of myriad Bubbles enveloping the globe. I believe China is in the midst of a historic Credit Bubble. Looking at rampant Credit and speculative excesses throughout the “developing” markets, I see ample confirmation of the Bubble thesis there as well. In hindsight, it should be indisputable that the massive issuance of debt (at artificially low borrowing costs) throughout the European periphery was a major Bubble. And I am very comfortable with the view that Washington policymaking – and resulting dollar devaluation – were fundamental to the global inflationary Bubble backdrop. From my perspective, the Treasury market has evolved into a most precarious Bubble of mispriced finance, over-issuance and severe market distortions of great consequence.
Analysis is a lot simpler in hindsight. From my analytical perspective, the sequence of how these global Bubbles might falter wasn’t obvious. Who would go first? China, Europe, “developing,” Treasurys, etc. The sequence would make a big difference on how things would be expected to unfold. Now, with the bursting of the sovereign debt Bubble in Europe, kindred Bubbles are impacted and in heightened jeopardy. Markets are under pressure, finance has tightened meaningfully, and faltering confidence is a major issue in Europe, the U.S. and beyond.

A strong case can be made that the global economy will prove less resilient than 2008. Credit excess over the past few years throughout the “developing” economies is a source of concern. China, Brazil, India, Russia, Mexico and others were at robust phases of their respective Credit cycles when the global crisis hit in 2008. Their markets, Credit systems and economies bounced back quickly - and proved the growth locomotive for global recovery. I fear recent excesses have created unappreciated vulnerabilities.

For now, Europe will likely remain the focal point. The continent’s debt structure is a major issue. Huge deficits have been financed by their banking sector. As confidence in sovereign debt falters, banking system stability crumbles. Here at home, we today enjoy a different dynamic. Most of our federal debt has been purchased by the People’s Bank of China, The Federal Reserve, The Bank of Japan and “developing” central banks around the world. In the short term, our debt structure is proving much more stable than Europe’s. Our banks look better by comparison – and our Treasury market appears bulletproof. The ECB has been forced into its version of “QE3”, while our divided Fed may not be as quick with additional quantitative easing as markets had expected. And perhaps, at least for now, we won’t have the world’s preeminent policy-induced currency devaluation – as the speculative trading world had confidently assumed. Or, stated differently, shorting dollars to fund inflating “undollar” risk markets around the globe might not be the sure bet many were presuming.

But let’s not digress… What we do know is that acute market instability has again reared its ugly head. Policymakers are reacting, of course. To this point, policy measures have succeeded in thwarting a breakdown. I am skeptical that policymaking will so easily stabilize the markets. The Fed’s move to pre-commit to “pegged” zero rates for a couple more years may somewhat benefit the leveraged speculating community – while throwing a volatile mixture on the Treasury Bubble. But who believes this is fair to savers or the right medicine for our economy? And Europe will be walking a tightrope, as they struggle to support the faltering periphery without imperiling the system’s core. And as contagion effects continue to mount, it will come down to the markets’ view of the German taxpayer’s willingness to backstop the continent.

Sovereign debt crisis means all the easy solutions have been expended – and all the proven and conventional ones as well. When former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alan Blinder was asked to comment on National Public Radio about the Fed’s new rate policy, he chuckled and said “they’re desperate.” I’ll assume it was nervous laughter. I will also presume that the marketplace will be increasingly unnerved that desperate policy measures risk destabilizing already highly unstable global markets (5% daily swings in equities; abrupt 4 point moves in bonds; 5% in currencies…). Are there any “safe havens”? There were in ’08. And all this equates to myriad market and economic uncertainties, including the risk of ongoing de-risking and de-leveraging. Best I can tell, the strongest bull argument going is that governments will support the markets. Well, the markets are in a world of hurt when that faith evaporates. This wasn’t much of an issue in 2008.

08/05/2011 Destabilizing Speculation *

For the week, the S&P500 sank 7.2% (down 4.6% y-t-d), and the Dow fell 5.8% (down 1.1%). The Banks fell 10.0% (down 20.7%), while the Broker/Dealers dropped 9.5% (down 21.5%). The Morgan Stanley Cyclicals fell 10.8%% (down 13.5%), and the Transports dropped 9.4% (down 8.1%). The Morgan Stanley Consumer index declined 5.2% (down 6.8%), and the Utilities lost 3.4% (up 1.7%). The S&P 400 Mid-Caps were hit for 10.5% (down 6.9%), and the small cap Russell 2000 was down 10.3% (down 8.8%). The Nasdaq100 fell 7.1% (down 1.1%), and the Morgan Stanley High Tech index dropped 7.6% (down 11.6%). The Semiconductors sank 9.5% (down 14.7%). The InteractiveWeek Internet index dropped 8.1% (down 8.8%). The Biotechs sank 15.7% (down 12.1%). Although bullion jumped $36, the HUI gold index fell 3.0% (down 8.1%).

One-month and three-month Treasury bill rates ended the week at one basis point. Two-year government yields declined 8 bps to 0.29%. Five-year T-note yields ended the week down 11 bps to 1.25%. Ten-year yields fell 24 bps to 2.56%. Long bond yields sank 27 bps to 3.85%. Benchmark Fannie MBS yields declined 17 bps to 3.64%. The spread between 10-year Treasury yields and benchmark MBS yields increased 7 to 108 bps. Agency 10-yr debt spreads increased 8 to about zero. The implied yield on December 2012 eurodollar futures dropped 6 bps to 0.665%. The 10-year dollar swap spread increased 4 to 16.75 bps. The 30-year swap spread increased 5 bps to negative 27 bps. Corporate bond spreads widened. An index of investment grade bond risk increased 7 bps to 103 bps. An index of junk bond risk jumped 86 bps to 582 bps (high since August 2010).

Investment-grade issuers included Coca-Cola $2.0bn, JPMorgan $1.25bn, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners $750 million, Lorillard Tobacco $750 million, Union Pacific $500 million, Dominion Resources $500 million, Hyatt Hotels $500 million, National Agriculture $500 million, Energen $400 million, MF Global $325 million, Reckson $250 million, Public Service Colorado $250 million, and Southwester Public Service $200 million.

Junk bond funds saw outflows of $804 million (from Lipper). I saw no junk debt issued this week.

I saw no convertible debt issued.

International dollar bond issuers included National Australia Bank $1.85bn and Ballarpur $200 million, .

German bund yields dropped 19 bps to 2.345% (down 62bps y-t-d), and U.K. 10-year gilt yields fell 17 bps this week to 2.69% (down 82bps). Greek two-year yields ended the week up 90 bps to 32.51% (up 2,028bps). Greek 10-year note yields rose 38 bps to 14.86% (up 240bps). Italian 10-yr yields jumped 22 bps to 6.08% (up 127bps), while Spain's 10-year yields declined 3 bps to 6.03% (up 59bps). Ten-year Portuguese yields gained 12 bps to 10.67% (up 409bps). Irish yields dropped 81 bps to 9.81% (up 76bps). The German DAX equities index dropped 12.9% (down 9.8% y-t-d). Japanese 10-year "JGB" yields declined 8 bps to 1.00% (down 12bps). Japan's Nikkei fell 5.4% (down 9.1%). Emerging markets were hit. For the week, Brazil's Bovespa equities index sank 10.0% (down 23.6%), and Mexico's Bolsa dropped 6.4% (down 12.6%). South Korea's Kospi index sank 8.9% (down 5.2%). India’s equities index fell 4.9% (down 15.6%). China’s Shanghai Exchange declined 2.8% (down 6.5%). Brazil’s benchmark dollar bond yields fell 12 bps to 3.62%, and Mexico's benchmark bond yields dropped 17 bps to 3.53%.

Freddie Mac 30-year fixed mortgage rates sank 16 bps to 4.39% (down 10bps y-o-y). Fifteen-year fixed rates were down 12 bps to 3.54% (down 41bps y-o-y). One-year ARMs rose 7 bps to 3.02% (down 53bps y-o-y). Bankrate's survey of jumbo mortgage borrowing costs had 30-yr fixed jumbo rates down two bps to 4.98% (down 48bps y-o-y).

Federal Reserve Credit declined $3.4bn to $2.850 TN. Fed Credit was up $442bn y-t-d and $540bn from a year ago, or 23.4%. Elsewhere, Fed Foreign Holdings of Treasury, Agency Debt this past week (ended 8/3) jumped $10.1bn to $3.463 TN. "Custody holdings" were up $113bn y-t-d and $309bn from a year ago, or 9.8%.

Global central bank "international reserve assets" (excluding gold) - as tallied by Bloomberg – were up $1.613 TN y-o-y, or 19.0% to a record $10.096 TN. Over two years, reserves were $3.07 TN higher, for 42% growth.

M2 (narrow) "money" supply jumped another $22bn to a record $9.315 TN. "Narrow money" has expanded at a 9.4% pace y-t-d and 8.1% over the past year. For the week, Currency increased $2.1bn. Demand and Checkable Deposits rose $19.3bn, and Savings Deposits added $1.4bn. Small Denominated Deposits declined $3.9bn. Retail Money Funds increased $3.1bn.

Total Money Fund assets dropped $66bn last week to $2.568 TN. Money Fund assets were down $242bn y-t-d, with a decline of $250bn over the past year, or 8.9%.

Total Commercial Paper outstanding sank $31.7bn to $1.173 Trillion. CP was up $204bn y-t-d, or 29% annualized, with a one-year rise of $76bn.

Global Credit Market Watch:

August 5 – Bloomberg (John Detrixhe): “The U.S. had its AAA credit rating downgraded for the first time by Standard & Poor’s, which slammed the nation’s political process and said lawmakers failed to cut spending enough to reduce record deficits. S&P dropped the ranking one level to AA+, after warning on July 14 that it would reduce the rating in the absence of a ‘credible’ plan to lower deficits even if the nation’s $14.3 trillion debt limit was lifted. The U.S. was awarded the top credit ranking by New York-based S&P in 1941. It kept the outlook at “negative” amid the failure to end Bush-era tax cuts. ‘The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government’s medium-term debt dynamics,’ S&P said…”

August 4 – Bloomberg (Simone Meier): “Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann opposed the European Central Bank’s decision to resume bond purchases today… ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet told a press briefing in Frankfurt that while the decision was not unanimous… Germany’s Bundesbank, under then president Axel Weber, opposed the ECB’s initial decision to start buying the bonds of distressed euro-area governments in May last year, opening a rift with Trichet and other ECB policy makers. The ECB, which ceased purchases 18 weeks ago, re-entered markets today after Italian and Spanish yields soared to euro-era records.”

August 3 – Bloomberg (Jeffrey Donovan): “Italian opposition leader Pier Luigi Bersani said Italy ‘is in big trouble’ and needs a change of leadership to restore credibility to its political system and win back the confidence of investors.”

August 4 – Dow Jones (Prabha Natarajan): “High-yield investors, who had been immune to the broader market worries for so long, are starting to capitulate and sell. ‘Some European accounts are getting nervous and selling some good-quality bonds,’ said Adrian Miller, senior vice president of fixed-income strategy at Miller Tabak Roberts Securities. ‘This is catching on with some domestic accounts also seeking cash,’ he said.”

August 3 – Bloomberg (Lisa Abramowicz): “Trading in high-yield bonds plummeted to the lowest level in three years as investors fled from riskier assets on concern that a sovereign debt crisis was spreading to the U.S. from Europe. About $3.7 billion of publicly traded junk debt exchanged hands daily on average in the U.S. during July… That compares with a daily average of $4.3 billion last July and $5.4 billion for July 2009…”

Global Bubble Watch:

August 1 – Bloomberg (Michael Patterson): “Banks in the biggest emerging markets are losing the confidence of investors as loans turn sour after a two-year credit binge. Brazil’s financial shares have lost more this year than counterparts in crisis-stricken Europe as consumer defaults hit a 12-month high in June and borrowing costs climbed to 46%. Bank stocks in China are trading at lower valuations than global emerging-market indexes for the first time since 2006…. ‘People are beginning to smell the credit cycle turning,’ Michael Shaoul, chairman of Marketfield Asset Management and chief executive officer of… Oscar Gruss & Son, said… ‘Credit cycles have tremendous momentum, and whenever they turn you want to pay attention…’”

August 3 – Bloomberg (Patricia Kuo and Stephen Morris): “Private-equity firms face funding costs for European leveraged buyouts that exceed even the aftermath of Lehman… collapse as a weakening global economy and Europe’s debt crisis damp demand for high-yield, high-risk loans. Interest rates on loans to finance LBOs have risen to average 450 bps more than benchmarks since June, from 413 bps in the first five months… Margins peaked at about 437 bps following Lehman’s bankruptcy in late 2008.”

August 3 – Bloomberg (David Wilson): “Private companies in the U.S., like the federal government, have to deal with a rising debt burden as the country’s economy struggles to grow. …During this year’s first half, the ratio [the average ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, a gauge of cash flow for closely held enterprises} climbed by 0.62 times Ebitda to 5.83. The surge is more than twice the biggest full-year advance: 0.22 times, recorded in 2003 and 2008.”

August 4 – Dow Jones: “Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos said… that Europe's currency bloc is facing an ‘organized attack’ in the financial markets after investor jitters sent Italian and Spanish bond yields to record highs this week. ‘In the last few days the euro zone has been facing an organized attack against its core,’ Venizelos said… to the Greek parliament. ‘At this moment, big countries, countries that dominate, not just the European but also the global economy--such as Italy, such as France, such as Spain--countries that are among eight biggest in the world, are facing an unprecedented [increase] in their cost of capital… The cost of their public borrowing is exploding.’”

Currency Watch:

July 28 – Bloomberg (Paul Panckhurst): “Senior Chinese officials are ‘appalled’ by the impasse among U.S. politicians on raising the nation’s debt ceiling to avoid a default, said Stephen Roach, non-executive chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia Ltd. ‘Coming so shortly on the heels of the subprime crisis, the debate over the debt ceiling and the budget deficit is the last straw’ for China… Roach said…”

The U.S. dollar index increased 0.9% this week to 74.60 (down 5.6% y-t-d). For the week on the upside, the Swiss franc increased 2.4%. On the downside, the Australian dollar declined 5.0%, the New Zealand dollar 4.1%, the South African rand 3.4%, the Canadian dollar 2.7%, the Mexican peso 2.1%, the Japanese yen 2.1%, the Norwegian krone 1.8%, the Brazilian real 1.7%, the South Korean won 1.2%, the Singapore dollar 1.1%, the euro 0.8%, the Danish krone 0.8%, the Taiwanese dollar 0.3%, and the British pound 0.2%.

Commodities and Food Watch:\

August 3 – Wall Street Journal (Se Young Lee and In-Soo Nam): “South Korea's move to buy gold for the first time in 13 years is the latest in a growing trend of central banks diversifying their reserves and reducing dependence on the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency comes under greater scrutiny.”

The CRB index dropped 4.5% this week (down 1.8% y-t-d). The Goldman Sachs Commodities Index sank 5.9% (up 2.2%). Spot Gold rose 2.2% to a record $1,664 (up 17.1%). Silver sank 4.4% to $38.33 (up 24%). September Crude was hit $8.59 to $87.11 (down 5%). September Gasoline sank 7.8% (up 15%), and September Natural Gas fell 4.6% (down 10%). September Copper was hit for 8% (down 7%). September Wheat increased 1.0% (down 15%), and September Corn jumped 4.1%(up 10%).

China Bubble Watch:

August 2 – Bloomberg (Fion Li): “Yuan-denominated debt sales in Hong Kong dropped to a four-month low in July as Moody’s… warned of governance concerns at Chinese companies and Europe’s debt crisis cooled demand for emerging-market assets. Sales of so-called dim sum bonds totaled 9.4 billion yuan ($1.5 billion), down from 15.2 billion yuan in June, 30.1 billion yuan in May… The securities… handed investors a 0.4% loss after declining 1.0% in June…”

August 1 – Bloomberg (Angela Greiling Keane): “China’s home prices rose at the slowest pace in 11 months in July after the government expanded efforts to curb the risk of an asset bubble, according to SouFun Holdings Ltd. Home prices gained 0.2% in July from June… Residential prices increased in 66 out of 100 cities tracked… with average home values nationwide climbing to 8,874 yuan ($1,378) a square meter (10.76 square feet)…”

Latin America:

August 1 – Bloomberg (Ye Xie and Bryan Gibel): “Investor confidence in Brazil’s central bank and Finance Ministry is flagging. Local bonds posted the biggest weekly decline in six months after the central bank signaled it may be done raising interest rates to curb inflation and the government levied a new tax on currency trading.”

Unbalanced Global Economy Watch:

August 1 – Bloomberg (Jana Randow): “European unemployment held steady for a fourth month… The 17-nation euro region’s seasonally adjusted jobless rate remained at 9.9%...”

August 1 – Bloomberg (Jonas Bergman and Toby Alder): “Swedish manufacturing slowed to a standstill after 25 months of growth as domestic and export orders declined in the largest Nordic economy.”

August 1 – Bloomberg (Michael Heath): “A gauge of Australian manufacturing slumped to a two-year low last month as a surging currency and the highest borrowing costs in the developed world hurt demand at home and abroad.”

August 2 – Bloomberg (Zainab Fattah): “Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal chose Saudi Binladin Group to construct a building in Jeddah that will replace Dubai’s Burj Khalifa as the world’s tallest tower. Kingdom Tower will be more than 1,000 meters (3,281 feet) high and cost 4.6 billion riyals ($1.2 billion) to build…”

U.S. Bubble Economy Watch:

August 3 – Associated Press: “Unemployment rates rose in more than 90% of U.S. cities in June, mirroring a national slowdown in hiring. ...unemployment rates rose in 345 large metro areas. They dropped in 20 cities and were unchanged in seven. That's worse than May, when rates rose in only 210 cities. And it is a sharp reversal from April, when unemployment rates fell in nearly all metro areas.”

August 3 – Bloomberg (Bob Willis): “Spending on services, the biggest part of the U.S. economy, has barely budged in the two years since the recession ended as ‘distressed’ households hold the line on everything from vacations to restaurant visits. … spending on services adjusted for inflation has increased 2.2% since the economic slump ended and the recovery began in June 2009.”

Fiscal Watch:

August 3 – New York Times (Binyamin Appelbaum): “There is something you should know about the deal to cut federal spending that President Obama signed into law…: It does not actually reduce federal spending. By the end of the 10-year deal, the federal debt would be much larger than it is today. Indeed, both the government and its debts will continue to grow faster than the American economy, primarily because the new law does not address federal spending on health care. That is the reason that the ratings agency Standard & Poor’s and its rivals still are threatening to remove the United States from their lists of risk-free borrowers, although the other agencies, Moody’s and Fitch, both said Tuesday that they would watch and wait for now.”

July 28 – Bloomberg (Gopal Ratnam and Roxana Tiron): “Lockheed Martin Corp., Northrop Grumman Corp. and other top U.S. defense contractors are preparing for deeper defense cuts and budget delays by reducing costs and eliminating jobs in a bid to keep shareholder profits from shrinking. Lockheed, the world’s largest defense contractor, already has announced about 3,850 job cuts starting last year and is seeking more. The… maker of F-35 jets promised investors on July 26 that 2011 profit will be higher than earlier estimates, driven by higher operating margins -- a result of cost-cutting measures.”

August 3 – Bloomberg (Angela Greiling Keane): “The U.S. Postal Service, which expects to run out of money next month, widened its loss forecast for the year to $9 billion. The service, which says it will reach its $15 billion debt limit in September, increased its prediction for the fiscal year… previously said it would lose $8.3 billion, after an $8 billion loss a year earlier.”

Real Estate Watch:

August 3 – Bloomberg (Sarah Mulholland): “Late payments on commercial mortgages bundled and sold as bonds rose the most in more than 12 months, adding to concern that the market is deteriorating three years after the financial crisis choked off funding to borrowers. Delinquencies on the debt jumped 51 bps in July to a record 9.88%, according to… Trepp LLC…. ‘Much of the positive momentum that had been surrounding the CMBS market recently has now all but vanished in the past few weeks,’ according to… Trepp.”

August 2 – Bloomberg (Nadja Brandt): “High-end hotels in large U.S. cities are attracting buyers from Hong Kong, China and Singapore seeking to cater to a growing number of affluent Asians traveling abroad… The most recent transaction came last week, when the family of Hong Kong billionaire Cheng Yu-Tung purchased five luxury properties, including Manhattan’s Carlyle, for $570 million.”

Speculation Watch:

August 4 – Bloomberg (Kelly Bit and Saijel Kishan): “John Paulson, the money manager who earned about $5 billion in 2010, lost 4.6% in his biggest fund in July… The decline left Paulson’s Advantage Plus Fund, which uses strategies designed to profit from corporate events such as takeovers and bankruptcies, down 22% this year…”

Destabilizing Speculation:

“Thinkers” of things economic have for a long time debated the role profit-seeking speculators play in the marketplace. Milton Friedman famously contended that there really wasn’t such a thing as “destabilizing speculation.” On the contrary, he and others viewed speculators as a positive force in the markets - whose “buy low and sell high” profit motive tended to exert a stabilizing force. Today, European policymakers believe they are under attack from speculators determined to bring down their debt markets and currency regime. At this point, I doubt there are many that would downplay the integral role speculation plays in our dangerously unstable global markets.

But let’s give the “no destabilizing speculation” thesis its due. Actually, in largely contained and self-regulating Credit systems, speculation may indeed provide a stabilizing influence. Think in terms of a gold standard where an economic system is demonstrating lending and spending excesses - along with attendant current account deficits. If the marketplace appreciates that an outflow of gold would pressure interest rates higher thus imposing system restraint, speculators will be incentivized to place their bets accordingly (short bonds, for example). Their activity will work to assist the system’s self-adjustment process.

Or, let’s ponder a Credit system restrained not by a backing of gold but instead through principled and disciplined policymaking. Here, policy doctrine has credibility in the marketplace. In the event that excess begins to emerge, market participants will factor in the inevitability of a policy response. If the marketplace knows that lending, asset price inflation and a deteriorating current account position will elicit monetary tightening, then speculators will position for such a tightening as the signs of excess begin to emerge. If, on the other hand, signs of lending restraint, economic weakness and risk aversion surface, speculative bets on imminent “easing” (i.e. long stocks and bonds) would similarly work to support the system’s self-adjustment process. In short, if the markets appreciate that there are reliable mechanisms to counter the emergence of overly loose or overly tight financial conditions, then speculators in reality would be expected to place their bets in a manner that would generally be in concert with system stabilization (others would use the word “equilibrium”).

Alan Greenspan was a major proponent of the hedge fund community. He repeatedly asserted that the burgeoning leveraged speculating community was a positive force, enhancing the efficiency of the free market process and generally improving marketplace liquidity and the allocation of precious savings. The 1994 bond market rout and 1998 LTCM fiasco should have - but did not - dissuade this view.

Over the years, the “leveraged speculating community” became a critical factor for monetary policy. I have referred to “the most powerful monetary transmission mechanism in the history of central banking.” And I do believe that the Greenspan/Bernanke Fed has been quite cognizant of the role of leveraged speculation. Through pegging short-term borrowing costs and clearly telegraphing how policy would respond to heightened systemic stress, the Fed was instrumental in the incredible growth in global leveraged speculation. And with a brief statement or a little 25 bps rate reduction, the Fed had attained the power to immediately incite risk-taking, leveraging, higher asset prices and, accordingly, loosened financial conditions (not your granddad’s monetary mechanism). The interplay between central bankers and the leveraged speculators (hedge funds, proprietary trading desks, etc.) has been instrumental to the expansive global Credit Bubble.

Central to my analytical framework has been the thesis that the current extraordinary global Credit backdrop is unique historically. For the first time, global finance operates with no limits to either the quantity or quality of new credit creation. There is no gold standard; no Bretton Woods currency management regime; nor even an ad hoc dollar-reserve system to anchor Credit expansion.

Unconstrained finance is nirvana for speculation. Importantly, boundless Credit completely abrogates a system’s capacity to self-adjust. As we saw with the Bubble in mortgage (and Greek, Portuguese, Irish, Spanish, Italian…) Credit and now with Treasury debt, an enormous jump in the demand for Credit can be easily accommodated in the marketplace - even at declining interest rates. Why? Because unrestrained finance allows the supply of Credit to easily inflate to match heightened demand – with the cost of finance (the interest rate) determined much more by monetary policy than through a functioning market pricing (supply vs. demand) mechanism. In a variant of the old “Say’s Law,” contemporary finance enjoys the extraordinary capacity for the demand of Credit to create its own (highly elastic) supply – at a price chiefly determined by central bankers.

Importantly, unrestrained finance creates a backdrop where speculation will tend towards being destabilizing. Credit excess begets Credit excess. System Credit growth supports higher asset prices and stronger economic activity, which then promote additional Credit excess. Credit expansion will entice speculation on higher asset prices that, especially in a world of unrestrained finance, promotes additional trend-reinforcing Credit and speculative excess. Instead of speculation working alongside the system’s self-adjustment process, it decisively exacerbates the system’s proclivity for runaway excess. And if “activist” policymaking works to ensure that excesses are not allowed to be wrung out the system – well, you’ve fomented a very serious “destabilizing speculation” problem.

The 2008 crisis was devastating for the leveraged speculating community. Thousands of hedge funds closed shop, while general confidence in their structure was badly shaken. I thought one positive outcome from the crisis would be a much smaller and less destabilizing speculating community. It was not to be. In less than two years, hedge fund assets surpassed a record $2.0 Trillion. Wall Street “prop desks” were simply spun off to the unregulated hedge fund realm. Amazingly, global markets became more speculative and dysfunctional than ever.

It was not my intent to write a “theoretical” piece. Very important developments have unfolded, and I’m just hoping to shed a little analytical light. I have argued the “global government finance Bubble” thesis for 25 months now. A crack that commenced with Greece in April 2010 has recently become a huge issue.

Hedge fund de-leveraging was surely a primary factor behind this week’s market tailspin. The community is again on the wrong side of rapidly moving markets, and they’re being forced (voluntarily or by the “margin clerk”) to liquidate positions and rein in risk. Most pundits will ignore or downplay the significance of the speculators again running into trouble: “Those silly hedge funds. Let them unwind positions quickly so we can get back to the business of a bull market.” Publicly, many leading market commentators (including a few hedge fund “titans”) have remained unwavering bulls.

The leveraged speculating community has played a pivotal if unappreciated role in the post-2008 “global government finance Bubble.” The unprecedented global monetary and fiscal response incited re-risking and re-leveraging. Policy measures to reflate asset markets and stimulate economic recoveries created extraordinary opportunities for sophisticated market operators to garner incredible speculative profits. At the same time, the Fed’s zero rate policy induced huge flows out of low-yielding savings vehicles and into higher-returning risk assets and vehicles – certainly including the hedge fund community. Despite the 2008 fiasco, government policies inflated both fund returns and fund inflows, directly reflating the speculative Bubble in leveraged speculation.

First, massive fiscal stimulus ensured a recovery of both economic activity and corporate profits (and stock buybacks and M&A!). Second, with zero rates and the assurance of liquid markets, the Fed and other central bank virtually guaranteed a robust inflationary bias for securities markets generally. And third, an extraordinary combination of fiscal and monetary stimulus in the U.S. ensured powerful devaluation dynamics for the U.S. dollar – and resulting strong inflationary biases in virtually everything non-dollar. Somewhat ironically, the collapse of the mortgage/Wall Street Bubble incited “the gilded age in global leveraged speculation.”

The critical issue now is whether this Bubble has been pierced - or just suffered a setback. My view is that it has likely burst. There is today great uncertainty - a global crisis of confidence in policymaking, financial institutions, and the markets – and it will be no easy task to restore confidence. Once the forces of de-leveraging are unleashed, there is powerful momentum toward system instability. I expect this momentum will be especially difficult for policymakers to quell in a sovereign debt crisis backdrop.

First of all, the basic premise behind the re-emergence of post-’08 flows to the leveraged speculating community was that the funds would reliably generate strong investment returns. Especially with respect to the large and established funds, the thought was that if they survived 2008’s “hundred-year flood” they were “good to go” for quite a multi-year run. This past week’s market tumult pushed industry returns from disappointing to potentially terrible.

And at the fund level, it was assumed that post-crisis policymaking had significantly skewed the market risk versus return backdrop in the hedge funds’ favor. Policymakers were poised for an extended period of extreme stimulus, and policy was as well prepared to respond aggressively in order to safeguard market and economic recoveries. It was “moral hazard” and “systemic too big to fail” on an unprecedented global scale. The Bubble that unfolded was premised on the ongoing efficacy of policy stimulus – the efficacy of political processes and global monetary management. The “bulls” and speculators had been deeply emboldened.

My premise has been that the unfolding sovereign debt crisis would expose important market misconceptions, especially in regard to the efficacy of government policies to rectify government debt problems. Sovereign debt crises are a much different animal than private-debt crisis, and market complacency was in for a rude awakening. Importantly, some basic premises behind the Bubble in leveraged speculation would be disproved. Instead of controlling and reducing risk, the policymaking backdrop had in fact greatly increased market risk. Rather than leverage providing a mechanism to capitalize on policy-induced market “inefficiencies,” the leveraged players had been induced into another precarious Bubble environment. Instead of guaranteeing marketplace liquidity, the government-induced Bubble had ensured inevitable liquidity problems.

European policymakers are pilloried for their inability to deal with their escalating debt crisis. Well, a global sovereign debt crisis has been brewing for years. There are no easy solutions. The world is today inundated with debt lacking the backing of real economic wealth or wealth-creating capacity. Trillions upon Trillions of debt will not be repaid – and markets are frustrated that it is increasingly difficult for politicians to “kick the can”… “extend and pretend.” Meanwhile, at this late stage of the Credit cycle aggressive fiscal and monetary stimulus is largely an expended force. Speculators have until recently taken great comfort in the reality that it has required overwhelming stimulus just to stabilize highly maladjusted market and economic systems. Have we reached the point where the sophisticated players recognize that extreme policymaking has gone from supporting leveraged speculation to manifesting intolerable uncertainty and instability?

In the category of “be careful what you wish for,” global policy responses to the escalating crisis have of late acted only to further destabilize the currency markets. For awhile now, nowhere has policy seemingly created more certainty – hence speculative opportunity – than in the currencies. Washington has essentially guaranteed ongoing dollar devaluation, and the weak dollar has been instrumental to the global Bubble. The scope of dollar short positions – including sophisticated derivative speculations derived from interest rate differentials – is unknown but likely huge. This week it seemed that a short position against the dollar became less of a sure bet, a point made clear by policy moves from the Swiss, Japanese and ECB.

Today, the speculator community must have one eye on the debt markets and the other on the currencies – with nervous glances back and forth to unstable equities, commodities and the emerging markets. And now that de-risking and de-leveraging have begun in earnest – and with losses accumulating rapidly – the fear will be of de-leveraging begetting liquidity issues and only more de-leveraging. And, of course, today’s dog-eat-dog environment ensures that operators will now seek to profit (by selling first/"front running") from those needing to sell – after a couple of years of seeking to profit (buying first) from those that needed to buy. And there will be the issue of hedge fund redemptions, with the distinct possibility that industry fundamentals have recently taken a dramatic turn for the worse. And throw in the lingering problem with derivatives, ETFs and other instruments that create heightened risk of trend-reinforcing trading to the downside. Resulting uncertainty, tightened financial conditions and waning confidence portend economic disappointment – and the makings for burst Bubbles and bear markets.